Résumé
L2 learning is influenced by both individual learner variables and contextual factors. Contextual factors have been extensively researched, but although internal learner-specific variables have received attention, this has been to a lesser extent. Among these internal variables, L2 motivation and L2 aptitude are likely the most significant predictors of L2 learning progress and listening performance. This study explored the effects of (i) L2 motivation, following the L2 Motivational Self-System model; (ii) L2 aptitude; and (iii) phonological short-term memory (PSTM) on L2 listening performance. These variables combined have not yet been studied with reference to L2 listening. In this correlational study, a listening test was taken as a pre- and post-test in a sample of 104 Year 1 and Year 2 English language pre-service teachers from a Chilean University three months apart. L2 aptitude and PSTM measures were taken using the first two sections of the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) for the former variable, and a non-word repetition task for the latter. The results suggest that PSTM, but not L2 aptitude, predicted listening performance at time 2. Also, the results indicate that after adjusting for listening performance at time 1, the only motivational factor predicting listening performance at time 2 was learning experience.
Funding
This work was supported by the Chilean National Research and Development Agency ANID [Fondecyt grant number 1220209].
Références
Al-Hoorie A.H. (2018), The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis. “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No 4, pp. 721–754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.4.2
Andringa S., Olsthoorn N., van Beuningen C., Shoonen R., Hulstijn J. (2012), Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. “Language Learning”, No S2, pp. 49–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00706.x
Archibald L.M.D., Gathercole S.E. (2006), Nonword repetition: A comparison of tests. “Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research”, No 5, pp. 970–983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/070)
Artieda-Gutiérrez G. (2015), Individual differences in adult learners of English as a foreign language at two levels of proficiency. “Anuario de Filología: Estudios de Lingüística”, No 5, pp. 161–162.
Baddeley A. (2003), Working memory and language: An overview. “Journal of Communication Disorders”, No 3, pp. 189–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
Baddeley A.D., Gathercole S., Papagno C. (1998), The phonological loop as a language learning device. “Psychological Review”, No 1, pp. 158–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.105.1.158
Biedroń A. (2019). Language aptitude: Insights from L2 exceptional learners, (in:) Wen Z. E. Skehan, P., Biedroń, ́ A. Li, S. Sparks, R. (eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice. London: Routledge, pp. 168–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315122021-9
Biedroń A., Birdsong D. (2019), Highly proficient and gifted bilinguals, (in:) Houwer A., Ortega L. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 307–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316831922.017
Biedroń A., Pawlak M. (2016), New conceptualisations of linguistic giftedness. “Language Teaching”, 49, pp. 151–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000439
Biedroń A., Véliz-Campos M., Zychowicz K. (2022), Longitudinal effects of phonological short-term memory and working memory capacity on L2 grammar knowledge. “Advances in Cognitive Psychology”, No 18, pp. 113–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0353-1
Brunfaut T., Révész A. (2015), The role of task and listener characteristics in second language listening. “TESOL Quarterly”, No 1, pp. 141–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.168
Carroll J.B., Sapon S.M. (1959), Modern language aptitude test. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Clark H.H., Clark E.V. (1977), Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
DeKeyser R., Koeth J. (2011), Cognitive aptitudes for L2 learning, (in:) Hinkel E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Volume II. New York: Routledge, pp. 395–406.
Dörnyei Z. (2005), The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.05dor
Dörnyei Z. (2009), The L2 motivational self system, (in:) Dörnyei Z., Ushioda E. (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters, pp. 9–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-003
Dörnyei Z. (2010), The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective, (in:) Macaro E. (ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition. London: Continuum, pp. 247–267.
Dörnyei Z. (2019), Towards a better understanding of the L2 Learning Experience, the Cinderella of the L2 Motivational Self System. “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No 1, pp. 19–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.1.2
Dörnyei Z. (2020), Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485893
Dörnyei Z., Chan L. (2013), Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target languages. “Language Learning”, No 3, pp. 437–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12005
Dörnyei Z., Kubanyiova M. (2014), Motivating learners, motivating teachers: Building vision in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei Z., Skehan P. (2003), Individual differences in second language learning. (in:) Doughty C., Long M.H. (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell Publising, pp. 589–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch18
Doughty C. (2019), Cognitive language aptitude. “Language Learning”, No S1, pp. 101–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12322
Duman S., Yalçın Ş., Erçetin G. (2021), Working memory and language aptitude in relation to listening strategy instruction in an instructed SLA context. “Annual Review of Applied Linguistics”, No 41, pp. 108–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190521000040
Dunn K., Iwaniec J. (2021), Exploring the relationship between second language learning motivation and proficiency: a latent profiling approach. “Studies in Second Language Acquisition”, No 4, pp. 967–997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000759
Ellis R. (2004), Individual differences in second language learning, (in:) Davies A., Elder C., (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 525–551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch21
Finch D.F., Ortiz-Lira H. (1982), A course in English phonetics for Spanish speakers. London: Heinemann Educational.
Gathercole S., Baddeley A.D. (1993), Working memory and language. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Granena G., Yilmaz Y. (2019), Corrective feedback and the role of implicit sequence-learning ability in L2 online performance. “Language Learning”, No S1, pp. 127–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12319
Gu S., Wang T. (2007), Study on the relationship between working memory and EFL listening comprehension. “CELEA Journal”, 34, pp. 46–56.
Hummel K.M. (2020), Phonological memory and L2 vocabulary learning in a narrated story task. “Journal of Psycholinguistic Research”, No 3, pp. 603–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09710-x
Hyltenstam K. (2018), Polyglotism: A synergy of abilities and predispositions, (in:) Hyltenstam K., Barting I., Fant L., (eds.), High level language proficiency in second language and multilingual contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 170–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316809686
Janse E., Newman R. (2013), Identifying nonwords: Effects of lexical neighborhoods, phonotactic probability, and listener characteristics. “Language and Speech”, No 4, pp. 421–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830912447914
Kaushanskaya M., Yoo J. (2013), Phonological short-term and working memory in bilinguals’ native and second language. „Applied Psycholinguistics”, No 5, pp. 1005–1037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000100
Kintsch W., van Dijk T.A. (1978), Toward a model of text comprehension and production. “Psychological Review”, No 5, pp. 363–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.85.5.363
Kong J.H., Han J.E., Kim S., Park H., Kim Y.S., Park H. (2018), L2 Motivational Self System, international posture and competitiveness of Korean CTL and LCTL college learners: A structural equation modeling approach. “System”, 72, pp. 178–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.11.005
Kormos J., Csizér K. (2008), Age-related differences in the motivation of learning English as a foreign language: Attitudes, selves, and motivated learning behavior. “Language Learning”, No 2, pp. 327–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00443.x
Kormos J., Sáfár A. (2008), Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. “Bilingualism: Language and Cognition”, No 2, pp. 261–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003416
Li S. (2016), The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. “Studies in Second Language Acquisition”, No 4, pp. 801–842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500042X
Li S. (2019), Six decades of language aptitude research: A comprehensive and critical review, (in:) Wen Z.E., Skehan P., Biedroń A., Li S., Sparks R. (eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice. London: Routledge, pp. 78–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315122021-5
Li M., Zhang L. (2021), Tibetan CSL learners’ L2 Motivational Self System and L2 achievement. “System”, No 4, 102436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102436
Martin K.I., Ellis N.C. (2012), The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. “Studies in Second Language Acquisition”, No 3, pp. 379–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000125
Masrai A. (2020), Exploring the impact of individual differences in aural vocabulary knowledge, written vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity on explaining L2 learners’ listening comprehension. “Applied Linguistics Review”, No 3, pp. 423–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2018-0106
Mikels J.A., Reuter-Lorenz P.A. (2019), Affective working memory: An integrative psychological construct. “Perspectives on Psychological Science”, No 4, pp. 543–559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619837597
Moskovsky C., Alrabai F., Paolini S., Ratcheva S. (2013), The effects of teachers’ motivational strategies on learners’ motivation: A controlled investigation of second language acquisition. „Language Learning”, No 1, pp. 34–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00717.x
Moskovsky C., Assulaimani T., Racheva S., Harkins J. (2016), The L2 motivational self system and L2 achievement: A study of Saudi EFL learners. “The Modern Language Journal”, No 3, pp. 641–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12340
Nagata H., Aline D., Ellis R. (1999), Modified input, language aptitude and the acquisition of word meanings, (in:) Ellis R., (ed.), Learning a Second Language Through Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 133–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.17.09nag
Nishida R., Yashima T. (2017), Language proficiency, motivation and affect among Japanese university EFL learners focusing on early language learning experience. “ARELE Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan”, 28, pp. 1–16.
Oportus R., Ferreira Cabrera A., Sáez Carrillo K. (2016), Memoria fonológica en español como lengua extranjera: un estudio relacional. “Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura”, No 2, pp. 153–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v21n02a03
Papagno P. (2022), The phonological loop as a ‘language learning device’, (in:) Schwieter J.W., Wen Z. (E.). (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of working memory and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108955638.007
Papi M., Teimuri Y. (2014), Language learner motivational types: A cluster analysis study. “Language Learning”, No 3, pp. 493–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12065
Ranta L. (2002), The role of learners’ language analytic ability in the communicative classroom, (in:) Robinson P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 159–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.11ran
Robinson P. (2002), Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA, (in:) Robinson P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 212–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.13rob
Sáfár A., Kormos J. (2008), Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. “IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching”, No 2, pp. 113–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2008.005
Sakai H. (2018), Working memory in listening, (in:) Liontas J.I. (ed.). The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0579
Satori M. (2010), The effect of teaching phonetic information through repeated practice of dictation and reading aloud in L2 listening class. “The Language Education & Technology”, 47, pp. 159–180.
Satori M. (2021), Effects of working memory on L2 linguistic knowledge and L2 listening comprehension. “Applied Psycholinguistics”, No 5, pp. 1313–1340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000345
Stansfield C.W., Reed D.J. (2004), The story behind the Modern Language Aptitude Test: An interview with John B. Carroll. “Language Assessment Quarterly”, No 1, pp. 43–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0101_4
Taguchi T., Magid M., Papi M. (2009), The L2 Motivational Self System among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian Learners of English: A Comparative Study, (in:) Dörnyei Z., Ushioda E. (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 Self. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters, pp. 66–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-005
Ueki M., Takeuchi O. (2013), Forming a clearer image of the ideal L2 self: The L2 motivational self system and learner autonomy in a Japanese EFL context. “Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching”, No 3, pp. 238–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.836205
Vafaee P., Suzuki Y. (2020), The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. “Studies in Second Language Acquisition”, No 2, pp. 383–410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000676
Vandergrift L., Baker S.C. (2015), Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. “Language Learning”, No 2, pp. 390–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12105
Vandergrift L., Baker S. C. (2018), Learner variables important for success in L2 listening comprehension in French immersion classrooms. “Canadian Modern Language Review”, No 1, pp. 79–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.3906
Véliz-Campos M, Polanco M. Biedroń A. (2020), L2 motivational self system, international posture, and the socioeconomic factor in EFL at university level: The case of Chile. “Psychology of Language and Communication”, No 24, pp. 142–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2020-0009
Véliz-Campos M. (2018), Pronunciation learning strategies, aptitude, and their relationship with pronunciation performance in pre-service English language teachers in Chile. “Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research”, No 6, pp. 57–76.
Wallace M.P. (2020), Individual differences in second language listening: Examining the role of knowledge, metacognitive awareness, memory, and attention. “Language Learning”, No 1, pp 5–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12424
Wen Z., Jackson O. (2022), Working memory, (in:) Li S., Papi M. (eds.), The Routledge of second language acquisition and individual differences. New York: Routledge, pp. 54–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546-5
Wen Z., Skehan P. (2011), A new perspective on foreign language aptitude research: building and supporting a case for “working memory as language aptitude”. “Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies”, No 60, pp. 15–044.
Wong Y.K. (2018), Structural relationships between second-language future self-image and the reading achievement of young Chinese language learners in Hong Kong. “System”, 72, pp. 201–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.12.003
Yousefi M., Mahmoodi M.H. (2022), The L2 motivational self-system: A meta-analysis approach. “International Journal of Applied Linguistics”, No 2, pp. 274–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12416
Licence
© Mauricio Véliz-Campos, Karina Cerda-Oñate, Adriana Biedroń, Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona, Leonardo Veliz 2024
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Auteurs :
Les auteurs de textes acceptés pour publication dans la revue Neofilolog sont tenus de remplir, signer et renvoyer à l'adresse de la rédaction, un accord sur l'octroi d'une licence gratuite pour les œuvres, avec obligation d'accorder une sous-licence CC.
En vertu de cet accord, les auteurs des textes publiés dans la revue Neofilolog accordent à l'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań une licence non exclusive et gratuite et permettent l'utilisation de la sous-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Les auteurs se réservent le droit de disposer librement de l'œuvre.
Utilisateurs :
Les utilisateurs d'Internet intéressés ont le droit d'utiliser les œuvres publiées à partir de l'année 2017 sous réserve des conditions suivantes :
- reconnaissance de la qualité d'auteur - l'obligation de fournir des informations sur la qualité d'auteur, le titre, la source (liens vers l'œuvre originale, DOI) et la licence, ainsi que l'œuvre distribuée ;
- sans créer d'œuvres dérivées - l'œuvre doit être conservée dans sa forme originale, p. ex. les traductions ou les interprétations ne peuvent être distribuées sans le consentement de l'auteur.
Tous les textes publiés sont soumis au droit d'auteur.
Autres :
L'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań se réserve le droit à la revue dans son ensemble (mise en page, forme graphique, titre, conception de la couverture, logo, etc.).
.