Mots-clés
elementary English in Japan
factors affecting rater perception
Comment citer
Résumé
This study aimed to explore assessment criteria for speaking interactions in performance tests conducted under the curriculum of formal elementary school English education in Japan, that are intended to foster students’ communicative competence in an authentic language use environment. Building on the framework of Sato and McNamara (2018), a qualitative analysis of rater perceptions of communicative elements of young learner oral interaction was conducted. The current study examined the perception of nine raters. The material for analysis consisted of transcripts from video recordings of the elementary school students’ role-play test. The findings indicated that the flow of interaction had a particularly strong impact on raters, along with five other factors. Perceptions of the use of L1 and nonverbal behaviors were nuanced, and only sometimes viewed favorably. Furthermore, in interaction involving limited vocabulary and use of formulaic expressions, speed was not always perceived positively and was occasionally seen as rote memorization. These insights could be applied in the holistic assessment of speaking tests in young beginner learners.
Références
Braun V., Clarke V. (2006), Using thematic analysis in psychology. “Qualitative Research in Psychology”, No. 3(2), pp. 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun V., Clarke V., Hayfield N., Frith H., Malson H., Moller N., Shah-Beckley I. (2019), Qualitative story completion: Possibilities and potential pitfalls. “Qualitative Research”, No. 16, pp. 136–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1536395
Britton M. (2021), Assessment for learning in primary language learning and teaching, Cambridge: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800410657
Brown S. (2005), Assessment for learning. “Learning and Teaching in Higher Education”, No. 1, pp. 81–89.
Butler Y.G. (2005), Comparative perspectives towards communicative activities among elementary school teachers in South Korea, Japan and Taiwan. “Language Teaching Research”, No. 9, pp. 423–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr176oa
Butler Y.G. (2022), Assessing young learners, (in:) Fulcher G., Harding L. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language testing. London: Routledge, pp. 153–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003220756-13
Butler Y.G. (2024), Self-assessment in second language learning. “Language Teaching”, No. 57, pp. 42–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000489
Cameron L. (2003), Challenges for ELT from the expansion in teaching children. “ELT Journal”, No. 57(2), pp. 105–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.2.105
Carless D. (2005), Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. “Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice”, No. 12, pp. 39–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000333904
Crotty M.J. (1998), The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
Ellis R. (2015), Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gass S.M., Behney J., Plonsky L. (2022), Second language acquisition, an introductory course. New York: Routledge.
Genesee F., Upshur J.A. (1996), Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hulstijn J.H. (2015), Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers: Theory and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.41
Johnstone R. (2009), An early start: what are the key conditions for generalized success?, (in:) Enever J., Moon J., Raman U. (eds.), Young learner English language policy and implementation: International perspectives. Reading: Garnet Education Publishing, pp. 31–42.
Lantolf J. P., Poehner, M.E. (2014), Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813850
Lightbown P.M., Spada N. (2022), How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long M. (1980), Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. University Microfilms International.
Mackey A. (2020), Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589284
Marsden E., Morgan-Short K., Thompson S., Abugaber D. (2018), Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field. “Language Learning”, No. 68.2, pp. 321–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12286
McCarthy M.J., McCarten J. (2018), Now you’re talking! Practicing conversation in second language learning, (in:) Jones C. (ed.), Practice in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316443118.003
Merriam S.B. (1998), Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “Case study research in education.” New Jersey: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
MEXT (2017), Shogakko gakushu shido yoryo gaikokugo katsudou, gaikokugo hen [The elementary school course of study for foreign languages]. https://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2019/03/18/1387017_011.pdf
MEXT (2022), Reiwa 4nenndo “Eigokyoiku jisshi jokyo chosa” no kekka nit suite shogakko [Results of the 2022 Survey on the implementation of English education in elementary schools]. https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/kokusai/gaikokugo/1415043_00004.htm
Mora J.C. (2006), Age effects on oral fluency development, (in:) Muñoz C. (ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 65–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598937-005
Nikolov M. (2016), A framework for young EFL learners’ diagnostic assessment: ‘Can do statements’ and task types, (in:) Nikolov M. (ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. New York: Springer Publishing, pp. 65–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0_4
Nikolov M., Timpe-Laughlin V. (2020), Assessing young learners’ foreign language abilities. “Language Teaching”, No. 54, pp. 1–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000294
Pinter A. (2017), Teaching young language learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rich S. (2019), Early language learning teacher education, (in:) Garton S., Copland F. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners. London: Routledge, pp. 44–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623672-4
Rixon S. (2016), Do developments in assessment represent the ‘coming of age’ of young learners’ English language teaching initiatives? The international picture, (in:) Nikolov M. (ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp. 19–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0_2
Sato T., McNamara T. (2018), What counts in second language oral communication ability? The perspective of linguistic laypersons. “Applied Linguistics”, No. 40(6), pp. 894–916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy032
Szpotowicz M., Lindgren E. (2011), Language achievements: a longitudinal perspective, (in:) Enever J., (ed.), Early Learning in Europe. ELLiE study. London: British Council, pp. 125–144.
Tracy-Ventura N., McManus K., Norris J.M., Ortega L. (2014), ‘Repeat as much as you can’: elicited imitation as a measure of oral proficiency in L2 French, (in:) Leclercq, P., Edmonds, A., & Hilton, H. (eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency perspectives from SLA. Bristol, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters, pp. 143-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092291-011
Vygotsky L.S. (1987), Thinking and speech. (in:) Rieber R. W., Carton A. S (eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1: Problems of general psychology. Plenum, pp. 39-288.
Wiliam D. (2011), What is assessment for learning?. “Studies in Educational Evaluation”, No. 37(1), pp. 3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
Wiliam D., Thompson M. (2017), Integrating assessment with learning: what will it take to make it work?, (in:) Dwyer C.A. (ed.), The future of assessment. London: Routledge, pp. 53–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315086545-3
Yagi M., Nakayama A., Nakai Y. (eds.), Shitsuteki gengo kyoiku wo kangaeyo. [Doing qualitative research in language education]. (2021). Hitsuji shobo.
Licence
© Yuki Otsuki 2025
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Auteurs :
Les auteurs de textes acceptés pour publication dans la revue Neofilolog sont tenus de remplir, signer et renvoyer à l'adresse de la rédaction, un accord sur l'octroi d'une licence gratuite pour les œuvres, avec obligation d'accorder une sous-licence CC.
En vertu de cet accord, les auteurs des textes publiés dans la revue Neofilolog accordent à l'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań une licence non exclusive et gratuite et permettent l'utilisation de la sous-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Les auteurs se réservent le droit de disposer librement de l'œuvre.
Utilisateurs :
Les utilisateurs d'Internet intéressés ont le droit d'utiliser les œuvres publiées à partir de l'année 2017 sous réserve des conditions suivantes :
- reconnaissance de la qualité d'auteur - l'obligation de fournir des informations sur la qualité d'auteur, le titre, la source (liens vers l'œuvre originale, DOI) et la licence, ainsi que l'œuvre distribuée ;
- sans créer d'œuvres dérivées - l'œuvre doit être conservée dans sa forme originale, p. ex. les traductions ou les interprétations ne peuvent être distribuées sans le consentement de l'auteur.
Tous les textes publiés sont soumis au droit d'auteur.
Autres :
L'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań se réserve le droit à la revue dans son ensemble (mise en page, forme graphique, titre, conception de la couverture, logo, etc.).
.