La interferencia entre marcas e indicaciones geográficas en el ámbito vitivinícola

Main Article Content

Alessia Buggea

Abstrakt

The judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Sixth Chamber), Case T 696/15 of 9 February 2017, against EUIPO examines, among the procedural aspects of the European trade mark regime, non-registration of a wine product in the event of non-compliance with the essential, in particular absolute, requirements for the acquisition of a mark in the territory of the European Union. In examining the various provisions at European level which provide for the granting or denial of trademarks and for the purpose of ensuring that geographical indications are fully effective in the European trade mark registration proceedings, this is to prevent holders from incurring any the grounds for annulment, Regulation Nº 207/2009 on the Community trade mark (hereinafter referred to as the CTMR), 7. 1, (j), points out that they are excluded from the register ‘wine marks containing or consisting of a geographical indication identifying wines, or marks of spirit drinks containing or consisting of a geographical indication identifying the spirits, where such wines or drinks do not have such origin’. The inadmissibility of the application for a word mark which contains a geographical indication which does not belong to it and also coincides with other appellations of origin is, inter alia, the central argument of the judicial issue under consideration. The legal question arose in 2014, when a Spanish mercantile company (Bodegas Vega Sicilia) decided to register the word mark “Tempos Vega Sicilia” before the EUIPO which, however, denied the registration of the same because it the term “Sicilia” is part of the protected designations of origin for wines. Hence, the mercantile company decided to appeal in 2015 to the EU General Court, which rejected the appeal by ruling of 9 February 2017, also rejecting, as the EUIPO did at the time, the arguments of the applicant relating to the existence of a family of registered trade marks prior to the registration of the DO or the potential popularity of said family of trademarks and guaranteeing maximum protection of protected geographical denominations and, therefore, denying registration when, when included in a trademark, it was not limited to the product of the said geographical area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Buggea , A. (2018). La interferencia entre marcas e indicaciones geográficas en el ámbito vitivinícola. Przegląd Prawa Rolnego, (1(22), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.14746/ppr.2018.22.1.12
Dział
ARTYKUŁY. Prawo rolne za granicą

Bibliografia

  1. Baylos Corroza H. (1993), Tratado de Derecho Industrial, Madrid.
  2. Bercovitz Rodríguez-Cano A. (2006), Apuntes de Derecho Mercantil, Aranzadi, Pamplona.
  3. Botana Agra M.J. (2001), Las Denominaciones de Origen, en G. Jiménez Sánchez (dir.), Tratado de derecho mercantil, vol. 2: Las denominaciones de origen, Barcelona.
  4. Brandt D. (1985), La protection élargie de la marque de haute renommée au-delá des produits identiques et similaires, Genéve.
  5. Fernández-Nóvoa C. (2004), Tratado sobre Derecho de Marcas, Madrid.
  6. Fernández-Novoa C., García Vidal A. (1970), La Protección Internacional de las Denominaciones Geográficas de los productos, Madrid.
  7. Fernández-Novoa C., García Vidal A. (2001), Derecho de marcas: Legislación. Jurisprudencia comunitaria, Madrid.
  8. Fernández-Novoa C., García Vidal A. (2002), Legislación. Jurisprudencia comunitaria (Actualización), Madrid.
  9. Gangjee D. (2007), Quibbling Siblings: Conflicts between Trademarks and Geographical Indications, “Chicago-Kent Law Review” Vol. 82, No 3.
  10. Germanò A., Voyce M., Stern S. (2004), Australia e Usa all’attacco delle Indicazioni geografiche comunitarie, “Agricoltura – Istituzioni – Mercati (AIM), Rivista di diritto agroalimentare e ambientale” Vol. 1.
  11. Goebel B., Groeschl M. (2014), The long road to resolving conflicts between Trademarks and Geographical Indications, “The Trademark Reporter” Vol. 104, No 4.
  12. Guillerm Carau J. (2008), Denominaciones Geográficas de Calidad. Estudio de su reconocimiento y protección en la OMC, la UE y el Derecho español, Valencia.
  13. Largo Gil R. (1993), Las marcas de garantía, Madrid.
  14. Lobato M. (2007), Comentario a la Ley 17/2001 de Marcas, Navarra.
  15. Maroño Gargallo M. del M. (2002), La protección jurídica de las denominaciones de origen en los Derechos español y comunitario, Madrid.
  16. Marco Arcalá L.A. (2001), Las causas de denegación de registro de la marca comunitaria, Valencia.
  17. Martínez Gutiérrez A. (2008), La tutela comunitaria de las Denominaciones Geográficas, Barcelona.
  18. Martínez Gutiérrez A. (2011), Nuevos Títulos de protección de carácter comunitario para los vinos de calidad, Cizur Menor (Navarra).
  19. O’Connor B. (2004), The Law of Geografical Indications, London.
  20. Vanzetti A. (2009), Giurisprudenza Annotata di Diritto Industriale, Milan.