Abstrakt
Student autonomy refers to learners’ ability to control their learning processes, make independent decisions, and regulate their learning activities. Recognized as a crucial aspect of language learning, autonomy empowers learners to engage actively with language tasks and fosters lifelong learning skills. In recent research on L2 teaching, developing learner autonomy has emerged as a key goal, aligning with contemporary educational paradigms that emphasize learner-centered approaches. This study explores the role of process writing and mentoring in cultivating autonomy among high school L2 learners. The research project implemented a mentoring initiative wherein six graduate students guided thirteen high school students in crafting academic essays stimulated by literary texts. Its primary objective was to enhance students’ academic skills, with emphasis on fostering learner autonomy. The qualitative data sources included post-writing reflective assignments, diaries used to document the process and participants’ reflections, both written by high school students, and a focus-group interview held with them. The findings indicate positive shifts in learner autonomy development, including better time management, enhanced self-reflection, and more skillful resource evaluation, combined with heightened awareness of academic writing practices among the participants.
Finansowanie
Inicjatywa Doskonałości - Uczelnia Badawcza
Bibliografia
Abetang, M. A., Oguma, R. N., Abetang, A. P. (2020), Mentoring and the difference it makes in teachers’ work: A literature review. “European Journal of Education Studies,” No 7, pp. 301–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i6.3146
Bandura, A. (1977), Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. “Psychological Review,” No 84, pp. 191–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191
Benson, P. (2007), Autonomy in language teaching and learning. “Language Teaching,” No 40, pp. 21–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958
Council of Europe (2018), Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Council of Europe.
Dickinson, L. (1987), Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007), Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Droździał-Szelest, K. (1997). Language learning strategies in the process of acquiring a foreign language. Poznań: Motivex.
Eby, L. T. et al. (2004), Career benefits associated with mentoring for proteges: A meta-analysis. “Journal of Applied Psychology”, No 89, pp. 127–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127
Graves, D. (1983), Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
Holec, H. ([1979] 1981), Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Holmes, A. (2023), Fostering learner autonomy in higher education through coaching and mentoring for non-traditional learners. “International Journal of Education,” No 11, pp. 69–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v11i4.6185
Hoven, D. (1999), CALL-ing the learner into focus: Towards a learner-centred model. “WORLDCALL: Global Perspectives on Computer-Assisted Language Learning,” No 3, pp. 149–168.
Hyland, F. (2000), Teacher management of writing workshops: Two case studies. “Canadian Modern Language Review,” No 57, pp. 272–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.2.272
Jimenez Raya, J. and Vieira, F. (eds.) (2021), Autonomy in language education: Theory, research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429261336
Kutsyuruba, B. and Godden, L. (2019), The role of mentoring and coaching as a means of supporting the well-being of educators and students. “International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education,” No 8, pp. 229–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2019-081
Little, D. (1991), Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Little, D., Dam, L., Legenhausen, L. (2017), Language learner autonomy: Theory, practice and research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098606
Matsuda, P. K. (2003) Process and post-process: A discursive history. “Journal of Second Language Writing,” No 12, pp. 65–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00127-3
Ministerstwo Edukacji Narodowej (2017). Rozporządzenie Ministra Edukacji Narodowej z dnia 14 lutego 2017 r. w sprawie podstawy programowej wychowania przedszkolnego oraz podstawy programowej kształcenia ogólnego dla szkoły podstawowej, w tym dla uczniów z niepełnosprawnością intelektualną w stopniu umiarkowanym lub znacznym, kształcenia ogólnego dla branżowej szkoły I stopnia, kształcenia ogólnego dla szkoły specjalnej przysposabiającej do pracy oraz kształcenia ogólnego dla szkoły policealnej. Dziennik Ustaw 2017, pos. 356.
Michońska-Stadnik, A. (1996). Strategie uczenia się i autonomia w warunkach szkolnych. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Nunan, D. (1997), Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy, (in:) Benson P., Voller P. (eds.), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning, London: Routledge, pp. 192–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842172-16
Pawlak, M. (2008), Autonomia w nauce języka obcego – co osiągnęliśmy i dokąd zmierzamy. Poznań – Kalisz – Konin: Wydawnictwo UAM i PWSZ w Koninie.
Pawlak, M. (2011), Rozwijanie autonomii ucznia w pracy z uczniem niezwykłym. “Neofilolog”, No 36, pp. 301–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/n.2011.36.21
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2000), Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. “American Psychologist,” No 55, pp. 68–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
Ushioda, E. (2003), Motivation as a socially mediated process, (in:) Little D., Ridley J., Ushioda E. (eds.), Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: Teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment, Dublin: Authentik, pp. 90–102.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wallace, J. E., Haines, V. A. (2004), The benefits of mentoring for engineering students. “Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering,” No 10, pp. 377–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v10.i4.60
Wilczyńska, W. (1999), Uczyć się czy być nauczanym? O autonomii w przyswajaniu języka obcego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Yeung, M. (2019), Exploring the strength of the process writing approach as a pedagogy for fostering learner autonomy in writing among young learners. “English Language Teaching,” No 12, pp. 42–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n9p42
Zamel, V. (1982), Writing: The process of discovering meaning. “TESOL Quarterly,” No 16, pp. 195–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586792
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Piotr Matczak, Hanna Błauciak, Hanna Stelmaszczyk

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Przedstawiany utwór (artykuł) upubliczniany jest na podstawie umowy z autorem i na licencji Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Użytkownicy mają obowiązek podania wraz z rozpowszechnionym utworem, informacji o autorstwie, tytule, źródle (odnośniki do oryginalnego utworu, DOI) oraz samej licencji;
- bez tworzenia utworów zależnych,
- utwór musi być zachowany w oryginalnej postaci.
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu zachowuje prawo do czasopisma jako całości (układ, forma graficzna, tytuł, projekt okładki, logo itp.).
