Abstract
In recent years English for academic purposes (EAP) has become one of the mainstream fields of practice, study and research within language education, mainly due to the position of English as the international language of higher education and scientific research. The paper briefly examines the main assumptions of the approach in the context of its links to ESP (English for specific purposes), systemic functional linguistics and new literacy studies. However, the main focus of the present discussion is on genre-based pedagogy as the leading framework and an important point of reference for EAP education. To illustrate this perspective within the field, the notion of genre and its interpretations in foreign language teaching are discussed. Finally, two closely related academic genres – discussion and debate – are explored with the aim of indicating their potential benefits, areas of difficulty and challenges for students and teachers in the EAP classroom.
Literaturhinweise
Bakhtin M. (1986), Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bhatia V. J. (2002), Applied genre analysis: a multi-perspective model (in) “Ibérica”, No 4, pp. 3-19.
Carter R., McCarthy M. (1997), Exploring spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chamot A. U., O’Malley J. M. (1994), The CALLA handbook. New York: Addison Wesley.
Correa D., Echeverri S. (2017), Using a systemic genre-based approach to promote a situated view of academic writing among EFL pre-service teachers (in) “HOW”, No 24(1), pp. 44-62.
Dakowska M. (2005), Teaching English as a foreign language. A guide for professionals. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Derewianka B. (1990), Exploring how texts work. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.
Ennis R. H. (1996), Critical thinking dispositions: their nature and assessability (in) “Informal Logic”, No 18, pp. 165-183.
Halliday M. A. K. (1978), Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Hamp-Lyons L. (2011), English for Academic Purposes (in) Hinkel E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Vol. II. New York: Routledge, pp. 89-105.
Hughes R. (2002), Teaching and researching speaking. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Hyland K. (2002), Genre: language, context, and literacy (in) “Annual Review of Applied Linguistics”, No 22, pp. 113-135.
Hyland K. (2003), Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process (in) “Journal of Second Language Writing”, No 12 (1), pp. 17-29.
Hyland K. (2007), Genre pedagogy: language, literacy and L2 writing instruction (in) “Journal of Second Language Writing”, No 16 (3), pp. 148-164.
Hyland K. (2016), General and Specific EAP (in) Hyland K., Show P. (eds.), The Roultledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 17-29.
Hyland K., Hamp-Lyons L. (2002), EAP: issues and directions (in) “Journal of English for Academic Purposes”, No 1, pp. 1-12.
Johns A. M. (1997), Text, role and context: developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lillis T., Tuck J. (2016), Academic literacies: a critical lens on writing and reading in the academy (in) Hyland, K, Show, P. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 30-43.
Lin B. (2006), Vygotskian principles in a genre-based approach to teaching writing (in) “NUCB JLCC”, No 8 (3), pp. 69-82.
McCarthy M. (1998), Spoken language & applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murray N. (2016), An academic literacies argument for decentralizing EAP provision (in) “ELT Journal”, No 70 (4), pp. 435-443.
Nowicka A., Wilczyńska W. (2011), Authenticity in oral communication of instructed L2 learners (in) Pawlak M., Waniek-Klimczak E., Majer J. (eds.), Speaking and instructed foreign language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 24-41.
Paltridge B. (2001), Genre and the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Pérez-Llantada C., Swales J. M. (2017), English for academic purposes (in) Hinkel, E. (eds.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Vol. III. New York: Routledge, pp. 42-55.
Stewart T. (2003), Debate for ESOL students (in) “TESOL Journal”, No 12 (1), pp. 9-15.
Swales J. (1990), Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thornbury S. (2007), How to teach speaking. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Vygotsky L. (1978), Mind in the society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2018 Neofilolog

Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.
Autoren:
Die Autoren der zur Veröffentlichung in der Zeitschrift Neofilolog angenommenen Texte sind verpflichtet, den Vertrag über die Erteilung einer kostenlosen Lizenz für die Werke mit der Verpflichtung zur Erteilung einer Sublizenz CC auszufüllen, zu unterzeichnen und an die Adresse der Redaktion zurückzusenden.
Gemäß Vertrag erteilen die Autoren auf die in der Zeitschrift Neofilolog veröffentlichten Texte der Adam-Mickiewicz-Universität in Poznań eine nicht exklusive und kostenlose Lizenz und erlauben die Verwendung der Sublizenz Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Die Autoren behalten das Recht zur weiteren freien Verfügung über das Werk.
Benutzer:
Interessierte Onlinebenutzer dürfen die seit 2017 veröffentlichten Werke unter folgenden Bedingungen nutzen:
- Anerkennung der Urheberschaft - die Verpflichtung, zusammen mit dem verbreiteten Werk Informationen über die Urheberschaft, den Titel, die Quelle (Links zum Originalwerk, DOI) und die Lizenz selbst bereitzustellen;
- ohne Schaffung abgeleiteter Werke - das Werk muss in seiner ursprünglichen Form erhalten bleiben, ohne Zustimmung des Autors dürfen keine Studien, beispielsweise Übersetzungen, verbreitet werden.
Die Urheberrechte aller veröffentlichen Texte sind vorbehalten.
Sonstige:
Die Adam-Mickiewicz-Universität in Poznań behält das Recht auf die Zeitschrift als Gesamtheit (Layout, Grafik, Titel, Umschlagsprojekt, Logo usw.).
