Keywords
MA theses
affective factors
writing anxiety
emotions
affective strategies
How to Cite
Abstract
Academic writing, which necessitates a coordination of multiple higherlevel cognitive skills, poses a challenge to graduate students. The heightened cognitive demands often cause negative emotions, such as stress, frustration, discouragement, but can also evoke positive ones, such as pride, satisfaction, and a feeling of accomplishment. This article reports the findings of a longitudinal qualitative study which aimed at exploring the emotions experienced by the participants, eleven students in an MA seminar, in the process of working on their theses, and the affective strategies they used. The data were collected through diaries kept by the participants over one academic year in which they recorded the emotions that accompanied them during the writing task. The data revealed a fluctuating and dynamic nature of the negative and positive emotions, out of which frustration and satisfaction were the most frequently experienced by the participants. Moreover, a range of affective strategies to control emotions and persist in writing were identified in the diary excerpts. The study illuminates the need to cater to the emotional side of graduate students’ thesis writing by providing them with support and appropriate training in self-regulation.
References
Arnold J., Brown H. D. (1999), A map of the terrain (in) Arnold, J. (ed.), Affect in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-24.
Bailey S. (2011), Academic writing. A handbook for international students. Third edition. New York and London: Routledge.
Bazrafkan L., Shokrpour N., Yousefi A., Yamani, N. (2016), Management of stress and anxiety among PhD students during thesis writing: A qualitative study (in) “The Health Care Manager”, No 35, pp. 231-240.
Bitchener J. (2010), Writing and applied linguistics thesis or dissertation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Borg S. (2001), The research journal: a tool for promoting and understanding researcher development (in) “Language Teaching Research”, No 5, pp. 156-177.
Cayley R. (2013), Writing and enjoyment (in) “Explorations of style: A blog about academic writing”. Online: https://explorationsofstyle.com/2013/04/12/links-writing-and-enjoyment/ [ED: 2.05.2018].
Cheng Y., Horwitz E., Schallert, D. (1999), Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components (in) “Language Learning”, No 49, pp. 417-446.
Coffin C., Curry M., Goodman S., Hewings A., Lillis T., Swann J. (2003), Teaching academic writing. A toolkit for higher education. New York and London: Routledge.
Creswell J. (2014), Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Daly J. (1978), Writing apprehension and writing competency (in) “The Journal of Educational Research”, No 72, pp. 10-14.
Dewaele J.-M., MacIntyre P. (2014), The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No 4, pp. 237-274.
Dörnyei Z. (2007), Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hammann L. (2005), Self-regulation in academic writing tasks (in) “International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education”, No 17, pp. 15-26.
Huerta M., Goodson P., Beigi M., Chlup D. (2017), Graduate students as academic writers: writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence (in) “Higher Education Research & Development”, No 36, pp. 716-729.
Ganguly S., Kulkarni M., Gupta M. (2017), Predictors of academic performance among Indian students (in) “Social Psychology of Education”, No 20, pp. 139-157.
MacIntyre P., Mercer S. (2014), Introducing positive psychology to SLA (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No 4, pp. 153-172.
MacIntyre P., Vincze L. (2017), Positive and negative emotions underlie motivation for L2 learning (in) “Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No 7, pp. 61-88.
McLeod S. (1987), Some thoughts about feelings: The affective domain and the writing process (in) “College Composition and Communication”, No 38, pp. 426-435.
Mu C., Carrington S. (2007), An investigation of three Chinese students' English writing strategies (in) “TESL-EJ”, No 11, pp. 1-23.
Oxford R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Oxford R. (2016), Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Selfregulation in context. 2nd edition. New York and London: Routledge.
Russell-Pinson L., Harris, M. (2017), Anguish and anxiety, stress and strain: Attending to writers’ stress in the dissertation process (in) “Journal of Second Language Writing” (Advance access). Online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1060374317302977 [ED: 2.05.2018].
Scardamalia M. (1981), How children cope with the cognitive demands of writing (in) Frederiksen C., Dominic J. (eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 81-103.
Schunk D. (2003), Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation (in) “Reading & Writing Quarterly”, No 19, pp. 159-172.
Siek-Piskozub T. (2016), The compatibility of positive psychology and the Ludic strategy in foreign language education (in) “Glottodidactica”, No XLIII, pp. 97-106.
Torrance M., Galbraith, D. (2006), The processing demands of writing (in) Mac-Arthur C., Graham S., Fitzgerald J. (eds.), Handbook of Writing Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 67-80.
Zabihi R. (2018), The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing (in) “Written Communication”, No 35, pp. 32-57.
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Neofilolog
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors
Authors of texts accepted for publication in Neofilolog are required to complete, sign and return to the Editorial team’s office the Agreement for granting a royalty-free license to works with a commitment to grant a CC sub-license.
Under the agreement, the authors of the texts published in Neofilolog grant Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań a non-exclusive, royalty-free license and authorize the use of Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license.
The authors retain the right to the free disposal of the work.
Users
Interested Internet users are entitled to use works that have been published in Neofilolog since 2017, under the following conditions:
▪ attribution – obligation to provide, together with the distributed work, information about the authorship, title, source (link to the original work, DOI) and the license itself.
▪ no derivatives – the work must be preserved in its original form. Without the author's consent, it is not possible to distribute the modified work in the form of translations, publications, etc.
Copyrights are reserved for all texts published since 2017.
Miscellaneous
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań retains the property right as a whole (layout, graphic form, title, cover design, logo etc.).