Keywords
individualization
learner training
variety in the language classroom
How to Cite
Abstract
The process and outcome of second or foreign language (L2) learning are mediated by an array of variables, the most important of which are perhaps individual difference (ID) factors (cf. Dörnyei, 2005; Dörnyei, Ryan, 2015; Pawlak, 2012a, 2017a). It is therefore not surprising that such factors have been addressed by hundreds, if not thousands, of studies in the last several decades, and while the foci or methodology of such research have inevitably been subject to change, the role of individual variation in L2 has been taken for granted. Apart from illuminating the role of various ID factors, researchers have also attempted to draw up recommendations concerning how what we know about these factors can inform classroom practice. A question arises, though, about teachers’ awareness of different facets of individual variation, the steps they take to capitalize on learners’ individuality in providing instruction, and the degree to which they can be expected to successfully deal with ID factors in the classroom. The paper tackles these issues by reporting on a questionnaire study which involved 37 Polish teachers of English at different educational levels. The results indicate that, while the respondents are cognizant of individual differences and address them in teaching practice, their understanding thereof is limited and so are the actions they embark on in this respect.
References
Biedroń A., Pawlak M. (2016), The interface between research on individual difference variables and teaching practice: The case of cognitive factors and personality (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No. 6, pp. 395-422.
Carroll J. (1981), Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude (in) Diller K. C. (ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 83-118.
Cohen A. D. (2010), Focus on the language learner: Styles, strategies and motivation (in) Schmitt N. (ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (2nd ed.). London. Hodder Education, pp. 161-178.
Dewaele J.-M.. Alfawzan M. (2018), Does the effect of enjoyment outweigh that of anxiety in foreign language performance? (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No. 8, pp. 21-45.
Dörnyei Z. (2001), Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei Z. (2005), The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei Z., Hiver P. (2017), Language teacher immunity: A double-edged sword (in) “Applied Linguistics”, No, 38, pp. 405-423.
Dörnyei Z., MacIntyre P. D., Henry A. (eds.), 2015. Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei Z., Ryan S. (2015), The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.
Duckworth A. L., Peterson C., Matthews M. D., Kelly D. R. (2007), Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals (in) “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, No. 92, pp. 1087-1101.
Ellis R. (2010), Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback (in) “Studies in Second Language Acquisition”, No. 32, pp 335-349.
Gabryś-Barker D. (2014), From failure to failure with enthusiasm (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No. 4, pp. 301-325.
Gardner H. (1999), Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gkonou C., Daubney M., Dewaele J.-M. (2017), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Gregersen T., MacIntyre P. (2014), Capitalizing on language learners’ individuality: From premise to practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Griffiths C. (2018), The strategy factor in successful language learning: The tornado effect. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Hiver P. (2017), Tracing the signature dynamics of language teacher immunity: A retrodictive qualitative modeling study (in) “Modern Language Journal”, No. 101, pp. 669-699.
Kruk M., Zawodniak J. (2018), Boredom in practical English language classes: Insights from interview data (in) Szymański L., Zawodniak J., Łobodziec A., Smoluk M. (eds.), Interdisciplinary views on the English language, literature and culture. Zielona Góra: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, pp. 177-191.
Larsen-Freeman D., Cameron L. (2008), Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Li S. (2017), Cognitive differences in ISLA (in) Loewen S., Sato M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 396-417.
MacIntyre P. D., Legatto J. J. (2011), A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect (in) “Applied Linguistics”, No. 32, pp. 149-171.
MacIntyre P. D. (2007), Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process (in) “Modern Language Journal”, No. 91, pp. 564-576.
MacIntyre P. D., Mercer S. (2014), Introducing positive psychology to SLA (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No. 4, pp. 153-172.
Mahmoodzadeh M., Khajavy G. H. (2018). Towards conceptualizing language learning curiosity in SLA: An empirical study (in) “Journal of Psycholinguistic Research” (online). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9606-3.
Mystkowska-Wiertelak A., Pawlak M. (2017), Willingness to communicate in instructed Second language acquisition. Combining a macro- and microperspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Oxford R. L. (1990), Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford R. L. (2017), Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Self-regulation in context. London: Routledge.
Oxford R. L., Amerstorfer C. M. (eds.). (2017), Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situating strategy use in diverse contexts. London: Bloomsbury.
Oxford R. L., Lee R. L. (2008), The learners’ landscape and journey: A summary (in) Griffiths C. (ed.) Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 306-317.
Pavelescu L. M., Petrić B. (2018), Love and enjoyment in context: Four case studies of adolescent EFL learners (in) “Studies in second Language Learning and Teaching”, No. 8, pp. 73-101.
Pawlak M. (2012a), Individual differences in language learning and teaching: Achievements, prospects and challenges (in) Pawlak M. (ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. xix-xlvi.
Pawlak M. (2012b), The dynamic nature of motivation in language learning: A classroom perspective (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No. 2, pp. 249-278.
Pawlak M. (2017a), Overview of learner individual differences and their mediating effects on the process and outcome of interaction (in) Gurzynski-Weiss L. (ed.), Expanding individual difference Research in the interaction approach. Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 19-40.
Pawlak M. (2017b), Dynamiczny charakter zmiennych indywidualnych – wyzwania badawcze i implikacje dydaktyczne (in) “Neofilolog”, No. 48/1, pp. 9-28.
Pawlak M. (2018), Grammar Learning Strategy Inventory: Another look (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No. 8, pp. 351-379.
Pawlak M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak A., Bielak J. (2016), Investigating the nature of classroom WTC: A micro-perspective (in) “Language Teaching Research”, No. 20, pp. 654-671.
Pawlak M., Oxford R. L. (2018), Conclusion: The future of research into language learning strategies (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No. 8, pp. 523-535.
Pawlak M., Szyszka M. (2018), Researching pronunciation learning strategies: An overview and a critical look (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No. 8, pp. 293-323.
Pfenninger S. E. (2014), The misunderstood variable: Age effects as a function of type of instruction (in) “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, No. 4, pp. 529-556.
Pfenninger S. E., Singleton D. (2017), Beyond age effects in instructional L2 learning: Revisiting the age factor. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ranta L. (2008), Aptitude and good language learners (in) Griffiths, C. (ed.), Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 142-156.
Wen Z. (2015), Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Yamashita T. (2018), Grit and second language acquisition: Can passion and perseverance predict performance in Japanese language learning? Unpublished MA thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA.
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Neofilolog
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors
Authors of texts accepted for publication in Neofilolog are required to complete, sign and return to the Editorial team’s office the Agreement for granting a royalty-free license to works with a commitment to grant a CC sub-license.
Under the agreement, the authors of the texts published in Neofilolog grant Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań a non-exclusive, royalty-free license and authorize the use of Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license.
The authors retain the right to the free disposal of the work.
Users
Interested Internet users are entitled to use works that have been published in Neofilolog since 2017, under the following conditions:
▪ attribution – obligation to provide, together with the distributed work, information about the authorship, title, source (link to the original work, DOI) and the license itself.
▪ no derivatives – the work must be preserved in its original form. Without the author's consent, it is not possible to distribute the modified work in the form of translations, publications, etc.
Copyrights are reserved for all texts published since 2017.
Miscellaneous
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań retains the property right as a whole (layout, graphic form, title, cover design, logo etc.).