Keywords
foreign language teacher education
inclusive teaching practices
teacher concerns
teacher preparedness
How to Cite
Abstract
The study was conducted in a group of second year university students – pre-service teachers of English as a foreign language (EFL). The aim of the study was to investigate how the trainee teachers’ participation in a compulsory SEN-dedicated course delivered online impacted their self-reported concerns and preparedness to implement inclusive teaching practices with foreign language (FL) learners with special educational needs (SEN). A semester-long course was designed and conducted as part of emergency remote instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was collected online via before and after course questionnaires. Principal component analysis of the preparedness and concerns scales led to a two-factor (F1 – self-efficacy beliefs and knowledge and F2 – attitudes) and a single factor solution (concerns) respectively. The pre- (N=113) and post-course (N=86) online survey responses were compared with regard to all the factors. The analysis showed that the participants’ post-course attitudes were more positive than at the beginning of the course, but the difference was not statistically significant. We observed a statistically significant increase in the trainee teachers’ post-course self-efficacy beliefs and knowledge of inclusion and SEN, with a large effect size. This change was paired with a statistically significant increase in their post-course concerns, with medium effect size for the change. A series of one-way MANOVAs showed that the effect of demographic variables (gender, teaching experience other than during practicum, experience with learners with SEN) on all factors across the two datasets was not statistically significant.
References
Avramidis E., Norwich B. (2002), Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. “European Journal of Special Needs Education”, 17, pp. 129–147.
Bandura A. (1977), Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. “Psychological Review”, 84, pp. 191–215.
Bandura A. (1997), Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W H Freeman/TimesBooks/ Henry Holt & Co.
Basturkmen H. (2012), Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. “System”, 40, pp. 282–295.
Campbell J., Gilmore L., Cuskelly M. (2003), Changing student teachers’ attitudes towards disability and inclusion. “Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability”, 28, pp. 369–379.
Chen T., Lucock M. (2022), The mental health of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey in the UK. “PLoS ONE”, 17(1).
Coady M.R., Harper C., de Jong E.J. (2016), Aiming for equity: Preparing mainstream teachers for inclusion or inclusive classrooms? “TESOL Quarterly”, 50(2), pp. 340–368.
Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K. (2011), Research methods in education. 7th edition. London: Routledge.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (2012), Teacher education for inclusion: Profile of inclusive teachers. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. Online: https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/Profile-of-Inclusive-T eachers.pdf [accessed 28.02.2022].
Field A. (2009), Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd edition. London: SAGE.
Forlin C., Earle C., Loreman T., Sharma U. (2011), The sentiments, attitudes, and concerns about inclusive education revised (SACIE-R) scale for measuring preservice teachers’ perceptions about inclusion. “Exceptionality Education International”, 21(3), pp. 50¬–65.
Guo Y., Connor C.M., Yang Y., Roehrig A.D., Morrison F.J. (2012), The effects of teacher qualification, teacher self-efficacy, and classroom practices on fifth graders’ literacy outcomes. “The Elementary School Journal”, 113(1), pp. 3–24.
Jelińska M., Paradowski M.B. (2021), The impact of demographics, life and work circumstances on college and university instructors’ well-being during quaranteaching. “Frontiers in Psychology”, 12.
Kormos J., Nijakowska J. (2017), Inclusive practices in teaching students with dyslexia: Second language teachers’ concerns, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs on a Massive Open Online Learning Course. “Teaching and Teacher Education”, 68, pp. 30–41.
Nijakowska J., Kormos J. (2016), Foreign language teacher training on dyslexia, (in:) Peer L., Reid G. (eds.), Multilingualism, literacy and dyslexia: Breaking down barriers for educators. London: Routledge, pp. 104–115.
Nijakowska J., Tsagari D., Spanoudis G. (2018), English as a foreign language teacher training needs and perceived preparedness to include dyslexic learners: The case of Greece, Cyprus and Poland. “Dyslexia”, 1–23.
Nijakowska J., Tsagari D., Spanoudis G. (2020), Cross-country comparison of EFL teacher preparedness to include dyslexic learners: Validation of a questionnaire. “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, 10, pp. 779–805.
OECD (2020), Mapping policy approaches and practices for the inclusion of students with special education needs. OECD Education Working Paper No. 227. OECD Publishing, Paris. Online: https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/600fbad5-en [accessed 28.02.2022].
Peebles J.L., Mondaglio S. (2014), The impact of direct experience on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching in inclusive classrooms. “International Journal of Inclusive Education”, 18, pp. 1321–1336.
Robinson D. (2017), Effective inclusive teacher education for special educational needs and disabilities: Some more thoughts on the way forward. “Teaching and Teacher Education”, 61, pp. 164–178.
Samuda V., Bygate M. (2008), Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sharma U., Forlin C., Loreman T. (2008), Impact of training on pre-service teachers’ attitudes and concerns about inclusive education and sentiments about persons with disabilities. “Disability and Society”, 23(7), pp. 773–785.
Sharma U., Forlin C., Loreman T., Earle T. (2006), Pre-service teachers’ attitudes, concerns, and sentiments about inclusive education: An international comparison of novice pre-service teachers. “International Journal of Special Education”, 21, pp. 80–93.
Sharma U., Nuttal A. (2016), The impact of training on pre-service teacher attitudes, concerns, and efficacy towards inclusion. “Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education”, 44(2), pp. 142–155.
Sharma U., Sokal L. (2015), The impact of a teacher education course on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about inclusion: An international comparison. “Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs”, 15, pp. 276–284.
Sharma U., Sokal L. (2016), Can teachers’ self-reported efficacy, concerns, and attitudes toward inclusion scores predict their actual inclusive classroom practices? “Australasian Journal of Special Education”, 40(1), pp. 21–38.
Tanner R., Green C. (1998), Tasks for teacher education: A reflective approach. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley Longman Publishing.
Tschannen-Moran M., Woolfolk Hoy A. (2001), Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. “Teaching and Teacher Education”, 17, pp. 783–805.
Tschannen-Moran M., Woolfolk Hoy A. (2007), The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. “Teaching and Teacher Education”, 23, pp. 944–956.
UNESCO (2017), A Guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. Online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248254 [accessed 28.02.2022].
Wallace M.J. (1991), Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Joanna Nijakowska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors
Authors of texts accepted for publication in Neofilolog are required to complete, sign and return to the Editorial team’s office the Agreement for granting a royalty-free license to works with a commitment to grant a CC sub-license.
Under the agreement, the authors of the texts published in Neofilolog grant Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań a non-exclusive, royalty-free license and authorize the use of Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license.
The authors retain the right to the free disposal of the work.
Users
Interested Internet users are entitled to use works that have been published in Neofilolog since 2017, under the following conditions:
▪ attribution – obligation to provide, together with the distributed work, information about the authorship, title, source (link to the original work, DOI) and the license itself.
▪ no derivatives – the work must be preserved in its original form. Without the author's consent, it is not possible to distribute the modified work in the form of translations, publications, etc.
Copyrights are reserved for all texts published since 2017.
Miscellaneous
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań retains the property right as a whole (layout, graphic form, title, cover design, logo etc.).