Abstract
Resorting to ecolinguistic theories, underscoring the concept of (trans)languaging and methodologies highlighting the need for analytical contextualization (Steffensen, Fill, 2014), the author presents the understanding of success in learning English as an L2 among selected multilingual students of Applied Linguistics at his home university, for whom knowledge of English and other languages is to be a final product of a professional character. Data has been elicited via focus group interview methodology (Parker, Tritter, 2006; Lankiewicz, 2023) with the use of a semi-structured interview and thematic framework analysis. The research findings suggest that English occupies a special place in students’ plurilingual repertoires and its pluricentric character helps them to be legitimate L2 users of their linguistic repertoires who do not measure their success by native speaker standards. The research undertaken offers insights into the process of the language learning evaluation of multilinguals via including their full linguistic repertoires to account for language learning processes.
References
Arroyo Hernández I., Paschke P. (2022), Perceptual, affective and cognitive factors of L2 pronunciation and foreign accent: a survey with Italian university students majoring in languages. SAIL, Vol. 23, pp. 63–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-628-2/003
Baran-Łucarz M. (2019), Podejście studentów filologii angielskiej do refleksji w nauce wymowy. „Neofilolog”, Vol. 42, No 1, pp. 9–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/n.2014.42.1.2
Bauman Z. (2000), Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benson P. (2001), Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Pearson.
Brown H. D. (2004), Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
CEFR (2018), Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989 [Accessed 16.11. 2023].
Cenoz J, Gorter D, May S. (eds). (2017) Language Awareness and Multilingualism. Third Edition. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02240-6
Cook V. J. (1991), The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence. “Second Language Research”, Vol. 7, No 2, pp. 103–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700203
Cooker L. (2015), Assessment as learner autonomy, (in:) Carol J. E., Murphy L. (eds.) Assessment and Autonomy in Language Learning. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 89–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414380_5
Creese A., Blackledge A. (2011), Separate and flexible bilingualism in contemporary schools: Multiple language practices in interrelationship. “Journal of Pragmatics”, Vol. 43, No 5, pp. 1196–1208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.006
Didenko A. V., Pichugova I. L. (2016), Post CLT or post-method: Major criticisms of the communicative approach and the definition of the current pedagogy. SHS Web of Conferences, 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162801028
Dzik K. (2019), Intercomprehension – a Mere Dream or a New Way of Learning in Globalised World? “Politeja”, Vol. 3, No 60, pp. 155–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.16.2019.60.10
Erling E. J., Moore E. (2021), Introduction – Socially just plurilingual education in Europe: shifting subjectivities and practices through research and action. “International Journal of Multilingualism”. Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 523–533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1913171
Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220923-1 [Accessed 30.11.2023].
Fang F. (2017), English as a Lingua Franca: Implications for Pedagogy and Assessment, “TEFLIN Journal”, Vol. 8, No 1, pp. 57–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v28i1/57-70
Foley J. A. (2019), Issues on Assessment using CEFR in the Region, “LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal”, Vol. 12, No 2, pp. 28–48.
French M. (2019), Multilingual pedagogies in practice. TESOL in Context, Vol. 28, No 1, pp. 21–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2019vol28no1art869
FREPA (2012), A Framework of Reference for Pluralistic Approaches to languages and cultures: Competences and resources. Graz: Council of Europe.
García O., Li W. (2014), Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism, and Education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765_4
Gębal P. (2016), Interkomprehensja, strategie mediacyjne i nauczanie języków obcych, (w:) Lipińska E., Seretny A. Tłumaczenie dydaktyczne w nowoczesnym kształceniu językowym, Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka, pp. 77–93
Griffiths C. (ed.). (2023), The Practice of English as a Medium of Instruction, (EMI) Around the World. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30613-6
Holborow M. (2015), Language and neoliberalism. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718163
Jamet M-C. (2022), Learner profiles and attitudes towards accent in the foreign language: The role of language backgrounds. SAIL, Vol. 23, pp. 2–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-628-2/001
Johnson K. (2008), An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. Second Edition. Harlow: Pearson.
Krueger R.A, Casey M.A (2000), Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Krueger R.A (1994), Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lankiewicz H. (2013), Dialekt w klasie językowej w świetle podejścia ekologicznego do nauczania języka, (w:) Pawlak (red.). Rola dyskursu edukacyjnego w uczeniu się i nauczaniu języka obcego, Poznań-Kalisz: Wydawnictwo naukowe UAM, pp. 9–29
Lankiewicz H. (2015), Teacher language awareness in the ecological perspective: A collaborative inquiry based on languaging. Gdańsk, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Lankiewicz H. (2018a), Sukces w nauce języka obcego w świetle podejścia ekologicznego. “Applied Linguistics Papers”, Vol. 25, No 1, pp. 99–115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.25449354.2018.1.pp.99-115
Lankiewicz H. (2018b), Is there a place for “sowing” in second language (L2) education at the university level? Neoliberal tenets under scrutiny, (in:) Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (eds). Challenges of second and foreign language education in a globalized world: studies in honor of Krystyna Droździał-Szelest. Cham: Springer, pp. 287–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66975-5_17
Lankiewicz H. (2023), Focus group interview in the ecological perspective on language study: An insight into critical language awareness of L2 users with regard to translingual practices of plurilingual, (in:) Lankiewicz H. (ed.). Extending Research Horizons in Applied Linguistics Between Interdisciplinarity and Methodological Diversity. Sheffield: Equinox.
Li W. (2017), Translanguaging as a practice theory of language. “Applied Linguistis”, Vol. 39, No 1, pp. 9–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039
Li W. (2011), Moment analysis and translanguaging space: discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. “Journal of Pragmatics”, Vol. 43, No 5, pp. 1222–1235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035
Liao L, Ye SX, Yang J. (2023), A mini review of communicative language testing. “Front. Psychol 14:1058411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1058411
Macaro E., Heath R. (2022), Editorial: Introduction to the special issue on English medium instruction: Areas of research needing urgent attention. “Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, Vol. 13, No 2, pp. 257–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38274
Mazak C.M. (2017), Introduction: theorizing translanguaging practices in higher education, (in:) Mazak C. M., Carroll K. S. (eds), Translanguaging in higher education: Beyond monolingual ideologies. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096657-003
Morgan D.L. (2001), Focus Groups Interviewing, (in:) Gubrium J.F., Holstein J.A. (eds). Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 141–59.
Nowak S.A., Szulc-Kurpaska M. (2022), W kierunku dobrostanu przyszłych nauczycieli języków obcych. „Języki obce w szkole”, Vol. 2, pp. 93–106.
Parker A., Tritter J. (2006), Focus Group Method and Methodology: Current Practice and Recent Debate. “International Journal of Research & Method in Education”, Vol. 29, pp. 23–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500537304
Rabiee F. (2004), Focus group interview and data analysis. “Proceedings of the Nutrition Society”, Vol. 63, pp. 655–660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399
Rajendram S. (2022), “Our country has gained independence, but we haven’t”: Collaborative translanguaging to decolonize English language teaching. “Annual Review of Applied Linguistics”, Vol. 42, pp. 78–86 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190521000155
Richards J.C., Rodgers T.S. (2001), Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ritchie J., Spencer L. (1994), Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research, (in:) Bryman A., Burgess R.G. (eds). Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge, pp. 173–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9
Robert J-M. (2011), L’inglese: un ponte verso le lingue romanze, (in:) De Carlo M. (ed.). Intercomprensione e educazione al plurilinguismo. Porto S. Elpidio:
Wizarts s.r.l., pp. 242 – 251, Online: https://www.academia.edu/11204524/Intercomprensione_e_educazione_plurilingue. [Accessed 30.11.2023].
Smuk M. (2016), Od cech osobowości do kompetencji savoir-être – rozwijanie samoświadomości w nauce języków obcych. Lublin-Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Werset.
Steffensen S.V., Fill A. (2014), Ecolinguistics: The State of the Art and Future Horizons. “Language Sciences”, Vol. 41A, pp. 6–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003
van Lier L. (2004), The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5
Widła H. (2014), Mierzalne wykładniki sukcesu – operacjonalizacja zmiennych, (w:)
Sujecka-Zając J., Jaroszewska A., Szymankiewicz K., et al. (red.), Inspiracja – Motywacja – Sukces. Rola materiałów dydaktycznych i form pracy na lekcji języka obcego, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, pp. 11–22.
Wilczyńska W. (2002), Podmiotowość i autonomia jako wyznaczniki osobistej kompetencji komunikacyjnej, (w:) Wilczyńska W. (red.). Autonomizacja w dydaktyce języków obcych: doskonalenie się w komunikacji ustnej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, pp. 51–67.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hadrian Lankiewicz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors
Authors of texts accepted for publication in Neofilolog are required to complete, sign and return to the Editorial team’s office the Agreement for granting a royalty-free license to works with a commitment to grant a CC sub-license.
Under the agreement, the authors of the texts published in Neofilolog grant Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań a non-exclusive, royalty-free license and authorize the use of Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license.
The authors retain the right to the free disposal of the work.
Users
Interested Internet users are entitled to use works that have been published in Neofilolog since 2017, under the following conditions:
▪ attribution – obligation to provide, together with the distributed work, information about the authorship, title, source (link to the original work, DOI) and the license itself.
▪ no derivatives – the work must be preserved in its original form. Without the author's consent, it is not possible to distribute the modified work in the form of translations, publications, etc.
Copyrights are reserved for all texts published since 2017.
Miscellaneous
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań retains the property right as a whole (layout, graphic form, title, cover design, logo etc.).