Résumé
Although boredom is among the most common academic emotions experienced by students at all possible levels of education, so far it has not received due attention from SLA theorists and researchers. Accordingly, the present paper aims to discuss the concept of boredom from the L2 classroom perspective with a special regard to the university students of English Philology. In the first part the authors provide a definition, present two basic typologies and highlight the causes of boredom followed by a brief overview of research into boredom in educational settings, whereas the second part is intended to approach a phenomenon of boredom on an empirical basis. The authors report on both quantitative and qualitative research findings concerning the intensity of boredom as felt by the subjects during the practical English language classes. First, the numerical results obtained from the Boredom Proneness Scale and correlated to boredom experienced in practical English language classes are referred to. Then the qualitative data gathered from the students’ descriptions of boredom-related situations during the said classes are commented on. Finally, the authors proceed to propose certain L2 classroom boredom-coping options.
Références
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M. i D. M. Tice. 1998. „Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1252-1265.
Beerman, C. i H. Cornjäger. 2011. „Die Rolle der Fachtwerteschätzung für Freude, Langewile und Angst im Fach Französisch: Eine memhrebenenanalytische Längsschnittstudie über die Sekundarstufe I unter Verwendung von Piecewise Growth Modellen”. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 16(2): 18-34.
Chapman, K. E. 2013. Boredom in the German foreign language classroom. Niepublikowana praca doktorska. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Danckert, J. A. i A. A. Allman. 2005. „Time flies when you’re having time: Temporal estimation and the experience of boredom”. Brain and Cognition, 59(3): 236-245.
Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dweck, J. V. i G. M. Walton. 2010. „Ego depletion – Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about will power affect self-regulation”. Psychological Science, 21(11): 1686-1693.
Eastwood, J. D., Cavaliere, C., Fahlman, S. A. i A. E. Eastwood. 2007. „A desire for desires: Boredom and its relation to alexithymia”. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(6): 1035-1045.
Fahlman, S. A. 2009. Development and validation of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale. Niepublikowana praca doktorska. Ottawa: York University.
Farmer, R. F. i N. D. Sundberg. 1986. „Boredom proneness: The development and correlates of a new scale”. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(1): 4-17.
Fisher, C. D. 1993. „Boredom at work: A neglected concept”. Human Relations, 46(3): 395-417.
Furner, J. M. i A. Gonzalez-DeHass. 2011. „How do students’ mastery and performance goals relate to math anxiety?” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(4): 227-242.
Gallimore, R. i R. Tharp. 1997. „Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse”. (w) Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. (red. L. C. Moll). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, str. 175-205.
Gendron, M., Lindquist, K. A., Barsalou, L. i L. F. Barrett. 2012. „Emotion words shape emotion percepts”. Emotion, 12(2): 314-325.
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R. i N. C. Hall. 2006. „The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences”. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(1): 5-29.
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., Nett, U. E., Pekrun, R. i A. A. Lipnevich. 2014. „An experience sampling approach”. Motivation and Emotion, 38(3): 401-419.
Goldberg, Y. K., Eastwood, J. D., LaGuardia, J. i J. Danckert. 2011. „Boredom: An emotional experience distinct from apathy, ahedonia, or depression”. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(6): 647-666.
Gregory, A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Hafen, C. A. i R. C. Pianta. 2014. „Effects of a professional development program on behavioral engagement of students in middle and high school”. Psychology in the Schools, 51(2): 143-163.
Gurycka, A. 1977. Przeciw nudzie: O aktywności. Warszawa: Nasza Księgarnia.
Hill, A. B. i R. E. Perkins. 1985. „Towards a model of boredom”. British Journal of Psychology, 76(2): 235-240.
Horwitz, E. 2001. „Language anxiety and achievement”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21: 112-126.
Jean, G. i D. Simard. 2011. „Grammar teaching and learning in L2: Necessary, but boring?” Foreign Language Annals, 44(3): 467-494.
Larson, R. W. i M. H. Richards. 1991. „Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students”. American Journal of Education, 99(4): 418-433.
LePera, N. 2011. „Relationships between boredom proneness, mindfulness, anxiety, depression and substance use”. The New Psychology Bulletin, 8(2): 15-25.
Macklem, G. L. 2015. Boredom in the classroom: Addressing student motivation, selfregulation, and engagement in learning. New York: Springer.
Miles, M. B. i A. M. Huberman. 2000. Analiza danych jakościowych. Białystok: Trans Humana.
Peacock, M. 1997. „The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners”. ELT Journal, 51(2): 144-156.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupinsky, R. H. i R. P. Perry. 2010. „Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3): 531-549.
Prince, M. 2004. „Does active learning work? A review of the research”. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3): 223-231.
Sommers, J. i S. J. Vodanovich. 2000. „Boredom proneness: Its relationship to psychological and physical-health symptoms”. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(1): 149-155.
Todman, M. 2013. „The dimensions of state boredom: Frequency, duration, unpleasantness, consequences and causal attributions”. Educational Research International, 1(1): 32-40.
Tulis, M., i S. M. Fulmer. 2013. „Students’ motivational and emotional experiences and their relationship to persistence during academic challenge in mathematics and reading”. Learning and Individual Differences, 27: 35-46.
Vogel-Walcutt, J., Fiorell, L., Carper, T. i S. Schatz. 2012. „The definition, assessment, and mitigation of state boredom within educational settings: A comprehensive review”. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1): 89-111.
Weir, K. 2013. „Never a dull moment: Things get interesting when psychologists take a closer look at boredom”. Monitor on Psychology, 44(7): 54.
Licence
© Mariusz Kruk, Joanna Zawodniak 2017
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Auteurs :
Les auteurs de textes acceptés pour publication dans la revue Neofilolog sont tenus de remplir, signer et renvoyer à l'adresse de la rédaction, un accord sur l'octroi d'une licence gratuite pour les œuvres, avec obligation d'accorder une sous-licence CC.
En vertu de cet accord, les auteurs des textes publiés dans la revue Neofilolog accordent à l'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań une licence non exclusive et gratuite et permettent l'utilisation de la sous-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Les auteurs se réservent le droit de disposer librement de l'œuvre.
Utilisateurs :
Les utilisateurs d'Internet intéressés ont le droit d'utiliser les œuvres publiées à partir de l'année 2017 sous réserve des conditions suivantes :
- reconnaissance de la qualité d'auteur - l'obligation de fournir des informations sur la qualité d'auteur, le titre, la source (liens vers l'œuvre originale, DOI) et la licence, ainsi que l'œuvre distribuée ;
- sans créer d'œuvres dérivées - l'œuvre doit être conservée dans sa forme originale, p. ex. les traductions ou les interprétations ne peuvent être distribuées sans le consentement de l'auteur.
Tous les textes publiés sont soumis au droit d'auteur.
Autres :
L'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań se réserve le droit à la revue dans son ensemble (mise en page, forme graphique, titre, conception de la couverture, logo, etc.).
.