Résumé
The paper aims to show how to engage students attending an online language course in various activities which by stimulating reflection enhance the learning process and result in better learning outcomes. By blending cognitivist, constructivist, constructionist and behavioural ideas, course developers and tutors can produce materials and use methods which satisfy the varied needs of adults who want to improve their writing skills. Such a blend leads to a unique design, which can be achieved by tools available in a virtual learning environment. Course participants will be more adequately prepared for writing genuine texts in the future through use of such activities as working with authentic resources integrated with different tasks and assignments to stimulate reflection; studying under the supervision and guidance of the tutor; participating in collaborative projects to promote learner autonomy; developing new knowledge through meaning-making discussions; doing peer review as well as summative, formative assessment, and self-assessment. Experience of these ways of working will help the participants to eventually become self-regulated, lifelong learners.Références
Anglia Ruskin University. 2010. http://www.ultraversity.net/ DW 6.08.2013.
Bartle, R. 2010. „Players” (w:) Online Communication and Collaboration (red. H. Donelan, K. Kear, M. Ramage). London: Routledge: 210-211.
Bender, T. 2012. Discussion-based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning: Theory, Practice, and Assessment. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Boellstorff, T. 2010. „Everyday Second Life” (w:) Online Communication and Collaboration (red. H. Donelan, K. Kear, M. Ramage). New York: Routledge: 212-219.
Brandes, G. M., Boskic, N. 2008. „Eportfolios: From description to analysis”. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, June. http://www. irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/502/1041 DW 21.11.2013.
Brookfield, S. 1988. „Developing critically reflective practitioners: A rationale for training educators of adults” (w:) Training Educators of Adults: The Theory and Practice of Graduate Adult Education (red. S. Brookfield). New York: Routledge: 325-327.
Can, T. 2009. „Learning and teaching languages online: A constructivist approach”. Novitas-ROYAL, 3(1): 60-74. http://www.ingilish.com/online-learning-constructivism. htm DW 20.11.2013.
Castronova, E. 2010. „The changing meaning of play” (w:) Online Communication and Collaboration (red. H. Donelan, K. Kear, M. Ramage). New York: Routledge: 204-209.
Donelan, H., Kear, K., Ramage, M. 2010. Online Communication and Collaboration. New York: Routledge.
Heriot-Watt University. 1999. Lola: Learning about Open Learning: Training Manu-al. Glasgow: Heriot-Watt University.
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perceptions. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
JISC. 2007. Effective Practice with e-assessment. Bristol: JISC.
Jordan, A., Carlile, O., Stack, A. 2008. Approaches to Learning: A Guide for Teachers. Meidenhead: Open University Press.
Lamy, M-N., Hampel, R. 2007. Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mokwa-Tarnowska, I. 2008. „Support mechanisms in teaching technical writing in the online environment” (w:) International Language Teaching Conference: Seeking most effective methods at different levels – organisation, methodology, tools (red. M. Chomicz, B. Trela). Warszawa: PWSBiA: 163-168.
Osterman, K. 1990. „Reflective practice: A new agenda for education”. Education and Urban Society 22(2): 135-152.
Osterman, K. F., Kottkamp, R. B. 1993. Reflective Practice for Educators: Improving Schooling through Professional Development. Newbury Park: Corwin Press, INC.
Papert, P., Harel, I. 1991. Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing Corporation. http://www.papert.org/articles/SituatingConstructionism.html DW 6.08.2010.
Piaget, J. 1969. Mechanisms of Perception. New York: Basic Books.
Schön. D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, Inc.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., Hartley, K. 2006. „Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning”. Research in Science Education 36 (1-2): 111-139.
Surbeck, E., Han, E. P., Moyer, J. E. 1991. „Assessing reflective responses in journals” Educational Leadership 48(6): 21-27.
Shuy, T, OVAE i TEAL staff. 2010. Self-regulated Learning. TEAL Center Fact Sheet no. 3.
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weller, M. 2007. Virtual Learning Environments. New York: Routledge.
Wenzel, R. 2001. The Education of a Language Teacher. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Willging, P. A., Johnson, S. D.. 2004. „Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses”. JALN 8(4): 105-118.
Licence
© Iwona Mokwa-Tarnowska 2019
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Auteurs :
Les auteurs de textes acceptés pour publication dans la revue Neofilolog sont tenus de remplir, signer et renvoyer à l'adresse de la rédaction, un accord sur l'octroi d'une licence gratuite pour les œuvres, avec obligation d'accorder une sous-licence CC.
En vertu de cet accord, les auteurs des textes publiés dans la revue Neofilolog accordent à l'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań une licence non exclusive et gratuite et permettent l'utilisation de la sous-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Les auteurs se réservent le droit de disposer librement de l'œuvre.
Utilisateurs :
Les utilisateurs d'Internet intéressés ont le droit d'utiliser les œuvres publiées à partir de l'année 2017 sous réserve des conditions suivantes :
- reconnaissance de la qualité d'auteur - l'obligation de fournir des informations sur la qualité d'auteur, le titre, la source (liens vers l'œuvre originale, DOI) et la licence, ainsi que l'œuvre distribuée ;
- sans créer d'œuvres dérivées - l'œuvre doit être conservée dans sa forme originale, p. ex. les traductions ou les interprétations ne peuvent être distribuées sans le consentement de l'auteur.
Tous les textes publiés sont soumis au droit d'auteur.
Autres :
L'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań se réserve le droit à la revue dans son ensemble (mise en page, forme graphique, titre, conception de la couverture, logo, etc.).
.