Mots-clés
refleksja
unikanie
bariera językowa
afekt
Comment citer
Résumé
Reflection is understood as an activity which enables the reproduction of past experiences, reflection and meditation about them and their evaluation. One of the most significant features shaping learner reflection may be willingness to communicate in a foreign language – one’s volitional readiness to enter a communicative event in this language. In spite of a wealth of research conducted in this area, it is still unclear why some students are willing to start communication in a foreign language, while others are adamant to avoid it. For the purpose of this paper a qualitative-quantitative study was performed, focusing on four students with very low levels of willingness to communicate in English, and four with very high levels. The research results demonstrate that high willingness is connected with feelings of safety, a tendency to achieve high proficiency and learning satisfaction. On the other hand, low willingness to communicate in English coexists with feelings of threat and unavoidable necessity to surrender to the demands of the educational system.Références
Baker, S. C., MacIntyre, P. D. 2003. „The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations”. Language Learning 50: 311-41.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D. 1985. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. London: Kogan Page.
Cao, Y. 2013. „Exploring dynamism in willingness to communicate: A longitudinal case study”. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 36: 160-176.
Cao, Y., Philp, J. 2006. „Interactional context and Willingness to Communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction”. System 34: 480-493.
Ellis, S., Carette, B., Anseel, F., Lievens, F. 2014. „Systematic reflections. Implications for learning from failure and successes”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 23: 67-72.
Hashimoto, Y. 2002. „Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context”. Second Language Studies 20: 29-70.
Kang, S. 2005. „Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language”. System 33: 277-292.
MacIntyre, P. D. 1994. „Variables underlying Willingness to Communicate: A causal analysis”. Communication Research Reports 11: 135-42.
MacIntyre, P. D. 2003. „Willingness to communicate in the second language: Proximal and distal influences”. Prezentacja na 33 corocznej konferencji Kanadyjskiego Związku Językoznawstwa Stosowanego, Halifax, NS, Kanada. 1 czerwca 2003. http://faculty.cbu.ca/pmacintyre/research_pages/other_files/WTC_handout.htm DW 17.07.2007.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S., Clément, R., Conrod, S. 2001. „Willingness to communicate, social support and language learning orientations of immersion students”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 369-88.
MacIntyre, P. D., Charos, C. 1996. „Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15: 3-26.
MacIntyre, P.D., Doucette, J. 2010. „Willingness to communicate and action control”. System 38: 161-71.
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., Noels, K. A. 1998. „Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation”. Modern Language Journal 82: 545-62.
Mady, C., Arnott, S. 2010. „Exploring the ‘situation’ of situational willingness to communicate: A volunteer youth exchange perspective”. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 13: 1-26.
Piechurska-Kuciel, E. 2011. „Willingness to communicate in L2 and self-perceived levels of FL skills in Polish adolescents” (w:) Aspects of culture in second language acquisition and foreign language learning (red. J. Arabski, A. Wojtaszek,). Berlin: Springer: 235-250.
Skehan, P. 1989. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.
Yashima, T. 2002. “Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context”. Modern Language Journal 86: 54-66.
Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., Shimizu, K. 2004. “The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication”. Language Learning 54: 119-152.
Yu, H., Li, H., Gou, X. 2011. “The personality-based variables and their correlations underlying willingness to communicate”. Asian Social Science 7: 253-257.
Licence
© Ewa Piechurska-Kuciel 2019
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Auteurs :
Les auteurs de textes acceptés pour publication dans la revue Neofilolog sont tenus de remplir, signer et renvoyer à l'adresse de la rédaction, un accord sur l'octroi d'une licence gratuite pour les œuvres, avec obligation d'accorder une sous-licence CC.
En vertu de cet accord, les auteurs des textes publiés dans la revue Neofilolog accordent à l'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań une licence non exclusive et gratuite et permettent l'utilisation de la sous-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Les auteurs se réservent le droit de disposer librement de l'œuvre.
Utilisateurs :
Les utilisateurs d'Internet intéressés ont le droit d'utiliser les œuvres publiées à partir de l'année 2017 sous réserve des conditions suivantes :
- reconnaissance de la qualité d'auteur - l'obligation de fournir des informations sur la qualité d'auteur, le titre, la source (liens vers l'œuvre originale, DOI) et la licence, ainsi que l'œuvre distribuée ;
- sans créer d'œuvres dérivées - l'œuvre doit être conservée dans sa forme originale, p. ex. les traductions ou les interprétations ne peuvent être distribuées sans le consentement de l'auteur.
Tous les textes publiés sont soumis au droit d'auteur.
Autres :
L'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań se réserve le droit à la revue dans son ensemble (mise en page, forme graphique, titre, conception de la couverture, logo, etc.).
.