Comment citer
Résumé
Although boredom is among the most frequently experienced academic emotions, it has received surprisingly little attention from L2 researchers and teachers. This paper aims to discuss and evaluate the existing quantitative and qualitative instruments that can be used for examining boredom in practical English classes. It will start with a brief overview of the causes and manifestations of boredom in the language classroom. This will be followed by the presentation of the methodology of three empirical studies which will serve as a basis for highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the data collection tools employed. Finally, an attempt will be made to delineate future research directions in the study of boredom in the L2 classroom and to illuminate the methodological choices available to researchers in this respect.
Références
Acee T. W., Kim H., Kim H. J., Kim J., Chu H. R., Kim M., Riekenberg J. J. (2010), Academic boredom in under- and over-challenging situations (w) „Contemporary Educational Psychology”, nr 35(1), str. 17-27.
Chapman K. E. (2013), Boredom in the German foreign language classroom. Niepublikowana praca doktorska. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Daniels L. M., Tze M. C., Goetz T. (2015), Examining boredom: Different causes for different coping profiles (w) „Learning and Individual Differences”, nr 37, str. 255-261.
Dörnyei Z., MacIntyre P., Henry A. (red.) (2015), Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Eastwood J. D., Cavaliere C., Fahlman S. A., Eastwood A. E. (2007), A desire for desires: Boredom and its relation to alexithymia (w) „Personality and Individual Differences”, nr 42 (6), str. 1035-1045.
Eastwood J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske M. J., Smilek D. (2012), The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention (w) „Perspectives on Psychological Science”, nr 7 (5), str. 482-495.
Fahlman S. A. (2009), Development and validation of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale. Niepublikowana praca doktorska. Ottawa: York University.
Farmer R. F., Sundberg N. D. (1986), Boredom proneness: The development and correlates of a new scale (w) „Journal of Personality Assessment”, nr 50 (1), str. 4-17.
Fisher C. D. (1993), Boredom at work: A neglected concept (w) „Human Relations”, nr 46 (3), str. 395-417.
Goetz T., Frenzel A. C., Pekrun R., Hall N. C. (2006), The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences (w) „Journal of Experimental Education”, nr 75 (1), str. 5-29.
Goetz T., Frenzel A. C., Hall N. C., Nett U. E., Pekrun R., Lipnevich A. A. (2014), An experience sampling approach (w) „Motivation and Emotion”, nr 38 (3), str. 400-419.
Goldberg Y. K., Eastwood J. D., LaGuardia J., Danckert J. (2011), Boredom: An emotional experience distinct from apathy, anhedonia, or depression (w) „Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology”, nr 30 (6), str. 647-666.
Gordon A., Wilkinson R., McGown A., Jovanoska S. (1997), The psychometric properties of the boredom proneness scale: An examination of its validity (w) „Psychological Studies”, nr 42, str. 85-97.
Hill A. B., Perkins R. E. (1985), Towards a model of boredom (w) „British Journal of Psychology”, nr 76 (2), str. 235-240.
Krashen S. D., Terrell T. D. (1983), The Natural Approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire: Phoenix ELT.
Kruk M., Zawodniak. J. (2017), Nuda a praktyczna nauka języka angielskiego (w) „Neofilolog”, nr 49 (1), str. 115-131.
Kruk M., Zawodniak J. (2018), Boredom in practical English language classes: Insights from interview data (w) Szymański L., Zawodniak J., Łobodziec A., Smoluk M. (red.), Interdisciplinary views on the English language, literature and culture. Zielona Góra: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, str. 177-191.
Kruk M., Pawlak M., Zawodniak J. (w druku), Another look at boredom in the language instruction: The role of the predictable and the unexpected.
Larsen-Freeman D., Cameron L. (2008), Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larson R. W., Richards M. H. (1991), Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students (w) „American Journal of Education”, nr 99 (4), str. 418-433.
LePera N. (2011), Relationships between boredom proneness, mindfulness, anxiety, depression and substance use (w) „The New Psychology Bulletin”, nr 8 (2), str. 15-25.
Macklem G. L. (2015), Boredom in the classroom: Addressing student motivation, self-regulation, and engagement in learning. New York: Springer.
Martin, M, Sadlo G., Stew G. (2006), The phenomenon of boredom. (w) „Qualitative Research in Psychology”, nr 3, str. 193-211.
Nett U. E., Goetz, T., Daniels L. M. (2010), What to do when feeling bored?: Students’ strategies for coping with boredom (w) „Learning & Individual Differences”, nr 20 (6), str. 626-638.
Neu J. (1998), Boring from within: Endogenous versus reactive boredom (w) Flack W. F., Laird J. D. (red.), Emotions in psychopathology: Theory and research. London: Oxford University Press, str. 158-170.
Pawlak M. (2017), Dynamiczny charakter zmiennych indywidualnych – wyzwania badawcze i implikacje dydaktyczne (w) „Neofilolog”, nr 48 (1), str. 9-28.
Pawlak M., Oxford R. L. (2018), The future of research into language learning strategies (w) „Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching”, nr 8 (2), str. 525-535.
Pekrun R. (2006), The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice (w) „Educational Psychology Review”, nr 18(4), str. 315-341.
Pekrun R., Goetz T., Daniels L. M., Stupinsky R. H., Perry R. P. (2010), Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion (w) „Journal of Educational Psychology”, nr 102 (3), str. 531-549.
Sommers J., Vodanovich S. J. (2000), Boredom proneness: Its relationship to psychological and physical-health symptoms (w) „Journal of Clinical Psychology”, nr 56 (1), str. 149-155.
Tulis M., Fulmer S. M. (2013), Students’ motivational and emotional experiences and their relationship to persistence during academic challenge in mathematics and reading (w) „Learning and Individual Differences”, nr 27, str. 35-46.
Vogel-Walcutt J., Fiorell L., Carper T., Schatz S. (2012), The definition, assessment, and mitigation of state boredom within educational settings: A comprehensive review (w) „Educational Psychology Review”, nr 24 (1), str. 89-111.
Winter R. (2002), Still bored in a culture of entertainment: Rediscovering passion and wonder. Westmont, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Zawodniak J., Kruk M., Chumas J. (2017), Towards conceptualizing boredom as an emotion in the EFL academic context” (w) „Konińskie Studia Językowe”, nr 5 (4), str. 425-441.
Zawodniak J., Kruk M. (2018a.), Porównawcze studium doświadczania nudy w nauce języków drugiego i trzeciego (w) „Applied Linguistics Papers”, nr 25 (3), str. 149-163.
Zawodniak J., Kruk M. (2018b.), Wpływ świata wirtualnego Second Life na zmiany w poziomie motywacji, lęku językowego i doświadczenia nudy u studentów filologii angielskiej (w) „Neofilolog”, nr 50 (1), str.65-85.
Zawodniak, J., Kruk M. (2019), Retrospektywne studium nudy doświadczanej podczas nauki języków angielskiego i niemieckiego (w) Woźnicka M. Stolarczyk- Gembiak, A., Trojszczak M. Zbliżenia 5: Językoznawstwo, literaturoznawstwo, translatologia. Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Koninie, str. 215-228.
Licence
© Joanna Zawodniak, Mirosław Pawlak, Mariusz Kruk 2019
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Auteurs :
Les auteurs de textes acceptés pour publication dans la revue Neofilolog sont tenus de remplir, signer et renvoyer à l'adresse de la rédaction, un accord sur l'octroi d'une licence gratuite pour les œuvres, avec obligation d'accorder une sous-licence CC.
En vertu de cet accord, les auteurs des textes publiés dans la revue Neofilolog accordent à l'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań une licence non exclusive et gratuite et permettent l'utilisation de la sous-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Les auteurs se réservent le droit de disposer librement de l'œuvre.
Utilisateurs :
Les utilisateurs d'Internet intéressés ont le droit d'utiliser les œuvres publiées à partir de l'année 2017 sous réserve des conditions suivantes :
- reconnaissance de la qualité d'auteur - l'obligation de fournir des informations sur la qualité d'auteur, le titre, la source (liens vers l'œuvre originale, DOI) et la licence, ainsi que l'œuvre distribuée ;
- sans créer d'œuvres dérivées - l'œuvre doit être conservée dans sa forme originale, p. ex. les traductions ou les interprétations ne peuvent être distribuées sans le consentement de l'auteur.
Tous les textes publiés sont soumis au droit d'auteur.
Autres :
L'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań se réserve le droit à la revue dans son ensemble (mise en page, forme graphique, titre, conception de la couverture, logo, etc.).
.