Résumé
Different societies have their own perspectives on the definition of a good language teacher, as their members attach varying degrees of importance to the different skills and personal qualities required for effective teaching. While available studies have identified numerous desired language and pedagogical competencies among educators, the dynamic post-pandemic reality has brought increased attention to the importance of building and maintaining relationships with students. This process inevitably involves emotional engagement from both educators and students. Consequently, there is a growing call for both groups to accept their true selves and act authentically in their educational interactions.
In response to the promotion of these values in education, this article aims to present the results of a study that sought to examine how experienced language students, representing Generation Z in Poland, define and evaluate authentic behaviours of their foreign language teachers. The participants of the study were asked to complete an online questionnaire containing both open and closed questions about their perceptions of their teachers’ authenticity. The thematic analysis of the qualitative data revealed a one-sided, unequivocally positive perception of authenticity, both in the general sense and in relation to the educational context. Numerous positive traits, such as sincerity, openness, sense of humour and didactic expertise were recognised as characteristics of authentic language teachers.
Références
Allen, H. B. (1980), What it means to be a professional in TESOL [Lecture], TEXTESOL conference, April 1980.
Alzeebaree, Y. and Zebari, I.A.H. (2021), What makes an effective EFL teacher: high school students’ perceptions. “The Asian ESP Journal”, pp. 169–183.
Bachman, L.F. and Palmer, A.S. (2010), Language assessment in practice: developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bialystok, L. (2015), Should teachers be authentic?. “Ethics and Education”, n. 10(3), pp. 313–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2015.1099801
Brown, H.D. and Lee, H. (2015), Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. Boston, MA: Pearson Education ESL.
Brown, S.A. and McIntyre, D. (1993), Making sense of teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Chickering, A.W. (2004), Encouraging authenticity and spirituality in higher education. “Journal of College and Character”, n. 5(1). Online: https://web.archive.org/web/20110616102857id_/http://journals.naspa.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1373&context=jcc [DW 14.02.2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-1639.1373
Comegys, J. (2001), Teacher authenticity: be you, not them. “Teach Better”. Online: https://teachbetter.com/blog/teacher-authenticity-be-you-not-them/ [DW 14.02.2023].
Cottingham, J. (2010), Integrity and fragmentation. “Journal of Applied Philosophy”, n. 27(1), pp. 2–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00472.x
Cranton, P. (2001), Becoming an authentic teacher in higher education. Malabar, Florida: Krieger.
Dąbrowska-Prokopowska, E. and Nowacki, G. (2020), Młodzi, gniewni i zagubieni, czyli o aktywności politycznej pokolenia Z we współczesnej Polsce. “Kwartalnik Trzeci Sektor”, n. 51-52 (3–4), pp. 64–79.
De Bruyckere, P. and Kirschner, P.A. (2016), Authentic teachers: Student criteria perceiving authenticity of teachers. “Cogent Education”, n. 3(1), p. 1247609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1247609
Dinçer, A. et al. (2013), Common characteristics of an effective English language teacher. “International Journal of Educational Researchers”, n. 4(3), pp. 1–8.
Ernst & Young. (2022), Is Gen Z the spark we need to see the light?. “EY. Building a better working world.” Online: https://www.ey.com/en_us/consulting/is-gen-z-the-spark-we-need-to-see-the-light-report [DW 14.02.2023].
Fidler, S. D. And Ramos, G. E. (2023), What is an authentic teacher and how can you become one?. “Times Higher Education”. Online: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/what-authentic-teacher-and-how-can-you-become-one [DW 14.02.2023].
Foust, J. (n.d.), What it means to be your authentic self?. “The Center for Growth”. Online: https://www.thecenterforgrowth.com/tips/what-it-means-to-be-your-authentic-self [DW 14.02.2023].
Gucma, M. (2012), Sukcesy i niepowodzenia pedagogiczne nauczycieli języka angielskiego w szkołach gimnazjalnych w świetle teorii Paulo Freire. Szczecin: Lulu.
Kaczegowic, C. (2023), How being yourself can transform your classroom. “Medium”. Online: https://medium.com/the-life-of-a-mexican-high-school-teacher/how-being-yourself-can-transform-your-classroom-760fa2d84605 [DW 14.02. 2023].
Kokkoris, M.D. and Kühnen, U. (2014), Express the real you. “Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology”, n. 45(8), pp. 1221–1228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114542467
Kreber, C. (2013), Authenticity in and through teaching in higher education: The transformative potential of the scholarship of teaching. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203072301
Kreber, C. et al. (2007), What do you mean by “Authentic”? A comparative review of the literature on conceptions of authenticity in teaching. “Adult Education Quarterly”, n. 58(1), pp. 22–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713607305939
Krippendorff, K. (2003), Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986), Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Leban, K. (2003), The professional profile of language educators, (in): Dupuis, V. et al. (eds.), Facing the future. Language educators across Europe. Council of Europe Publishing, pp. 69–99.
Lyons, M. (2021), Being your authentic self is easier said than done but worth it. “BetterUp”. Online: https://www.betterup.com/blog/authentic-self [DW 14.02.2023].
Łukasiński, W. and Nigbor-Drożdż, A. (2022), Postrzeganie determinant rozwoju startupu przez przedstawicieli pokolenia Z w Polsce. „Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy”, n. 71(3), pp. 142–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2022.3.9
McDonough, J. and Shaw, C. (1993), Materials and methods in ELT: a teacher’s guide. London: Blackwell Publishing.
Nosidlak, K. (2021), Uczniowie klas ósmych i ich wizja dobrego nauczyciela języka obcego (DNJO) – ujęcie retrospektywne’, (in): Rokita-Jaśkow, J. and Nosidlak, K. (eds.), Nauczanie dzieci języków obcych – globalne wyzwania, lokalne rozwiązania. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UP, pp. 205–221.
Palmer, Parker. (1998), The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. Jossey-Bass.
Plust, U., Murphy, D., and Joseph, S. (2020), A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative research into teacher’s authenticity. “Cambridge Journal of Education”, n. 51(3), pp. 301–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1829546
Rogers, R. J. (2018), What is an “authentic” teacher?. “Decrypt. Define. Delineate”. Online: https://richardjamesrogers.com/2018/03/18/what-is-an-authentic-teacher/ [DW 14.02.2023].
Rudduck, J., Chaplain, R. and Wallace, G. (1995), School improvement: What can pupils tell us? London: David Fulton Publishers.
Saldana, J. (2009), The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage Publications.
Smuk, M. (2009), Autentyczność w glottodydaktyce w perspektywie badawczej.„Neofilolog”, n. 33, pp. 123–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/n.2009.33.12
Taylor, Ch. (1991), The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, S. (2007), How is a ‘good teacher’ defined in a communicative, learner-centered EFL classroom?. Online: https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/college-artslaw/cels/essays/matefltesldissertations/thompsondiss.pdf [DW 14.02.2023].
Trilling, L. (1972), Sincerity and authenticity. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044463
Vakilifard, A., Keshavarz Afshar, A. (2024), Crafting a comprehensive model of language teachers’ attributes: insights from non-Iranian Persian learners on essential knowledge, competencies, and traits. “Language and Linguistics”, 19(37), pp. 55–84.
Varga, S. and Guignon, Ch. (2023) ‘Authenticity’, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/authenticity/ [DW 14.02.2023].
Werbińska, D. (2004), Skuteczny nauczyciel języka angielskiego – wnioski z badań. „Języki Obce w Szkole”, n. 1/2004, pp. 78–80.
Licence
© Katarzyna Nosidlak 2024
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Auteurs :
Les auteurs de textes acceptés pour publication dans la revue Neofilolog sont tenus de remplir, signer et renvoyer à l'adresse de la rédaction, un accord sur l'octroi d'une licence gratuite pour les œuvres, avec obligation d'accorder une sous-licence CC.
En vertu de cet accord, les auteurs des textes publiés dans la revue Neofilolog accordent à l'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań une licence non exclusive et gratuite et permettent l'utilisation de la sous-licence Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0).
Les auteurs se réservent le droit de disposer librement de l'œuvre.
Utilisateurs :
Les utilisateurs d'Internet intéressés ont le droit d'utiliser les œuvres publiées à partir de l'année 2017 sous réserve des conditions suivantes :
- reconnaissance de la qualité d'auteur - l'obligation de fournir des informations sur la qualité d'auteur, le titre, la source (liens vers l'œuvre originale, DOI) et la licence, ainsi que l'œuvre distribuée ;
- sans créer d'œuvres dérivées - l'œuvre doit être conservée dans sa forme originale, p. ex. les traductions ou les interprétations ne peuvent être distribuées sans le consentement de l'auteur.
Tous les textes publiés sont soumis au droit d'auteur.
Autres :
L'Université Adam Mickiewicz de Poznań se réserve le droit à la revue dans son ensemble (mise en page, forme graphique, titre, conception de la couverture, logo, etc.).
.