Jak cytować
Liczba wyświetleń: 378
Liczba pobrań: 256
Abstrakt
The aim of the article is to analyze the concept of sovereignty and the right of revolution laid down by the Scottish humanist George Buchanan in his dialogue “De jure regni apud Scotos” (“A dialogue, concerning the due privilege of government in the kingdom of Scotland”) in 1567. These concepts were grounded in the context of both philosophical and anthropological views of Buchanan himself. The paper presents Buchanan’s views pertaining to human nature and natural law. Moreover, it shows how deeply these notions influenced the shape of his concepts of authority, community, law as well as of their mutualinterdependence. The article also highlights the ambiguous character of the institutional dimension of the Scotsman’s theory and, at the same time, it emphasizes the coherence of his political and legal philosophy.
Bibliografia
Buchanan G., De iure regni apud Scotos, W: Mason, R.A., Smith, M.S., A dialogue on the Law of Kingship among the Scots – A critical Edition and Translation of George Buchanan’s De Iure Regni apud Scotos Dialogus, Aldershot 2004.
Bogucka M., Maria Stuart, Wrocław 2009.
Burns J.H., George Buchanan and the anti-monarchomachs critics. W: Political discourse in early modern Britain, red. N. Phillipson i Q. Skinner, Cambridge 2011.
Burns J.H., Ius Gladii and Iurisdictio: Jacques Almain and John Locke, „The Historical Journal” 26, nr 2 (1983).
Burns J.H., Lordship, Kingship and Empire – The Idea of Monarchy 1400-1525, Oxford 1992.
Burns J.H., Scholasticism: survival and revival. W: The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700, red. J.H. Burns, Cambridge 1991.
Burns J.H., The Political Ideas of George Buchanan, „Scottish Historical Review” 30, nr 109 (1951).
Bushnell R.W., George Buchanan, James VI and neo-classicism. W: Scots and Britons: Scottish political thought and the union of 1603, red. R.A. Mason, Cambridge 1994.
Dunbabin J., Government. W: The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c. 350-c.1450, red. J.H. Burns, Cambridge 2010.
Dzelzainis M., The Ciceronian theory of tyrannicide from Buchanan to Milton. W: George Buchanan: Political Thought in Early Modern Britain and Europe, red. C.E. Erskine i R.A. Mason, Nowy Jork 2016.
Erskine C.E., The Reputation of George Buchanan (1506-82) in the British Atlantic World before 1832, http://theses.gla.ac.uk/681/1/2004erskinephd.pdf [dostęp: 17.01.2018].
Ferente S., Popolo and law: Late medieval sovereignty in Marsilius and the jurists. W: Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective, red. R. Bourke i Q. Skinner, Cambridge 2016.
Franklin J.H., Sovereignty and the mixed constitution. W: The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700, red. J.H. Burns, Cambridge 1991.
Giesey R.E., The Monarchomach Triumvirs: Hotman, Beza, Mornay, „Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance” 32, nr 1 (1970).
Giesey R.E., When and why Hotman wrote Francogallia, „Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance” 29, nr 3 (1967).
Goodare J., The Admission of Lairds to the Scottish Parliament, „The English Historical Review” 116, nr 469 (2001).
Gray J., The Political Theory of John Knox, „Church history” 8, nr 2 (1939).
Hammer D., Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine, Cambridge 2014.
Kingdon R.N., Calvinism and resistance theory 1550-1580. W: The Cambridge history of political thought 1450-1700, red. J.H. Burns, Cambridge 1991.
Kraye J., Moral philosophy. W: The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, red. C.B. Schmitt i Q. Skinner, Cambridge 1990.
Lee D., Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought, Oxford 2016.
Levack B.P., Law, sovereignty, and the union. W: Scots and Britons – Scottish political thought and the union of 1603, red. R.A. Mason, Cambridge 1994.
Lewis E., Natural Law and Expediency in Medieval Political Theory, „Ethics” 50, nr 2 (1940).
Lines D.A., Humanistic and scholastic ethics. W: The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy, red. J. Hankins, Cambridge 2007.
Lloyd H.A., Constitutionalism. W: The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700, red. J.H. Burns, Cambridge 1991.
MacDonald A.R., Deliberative Processes in Parliament c.1567-1639: Multicameralism and the Lords of the Articles, „The Scottish Historical Review” 81, nr 211 (2002).
Mackie J.D., A history of Scotland, Hardmondsworth 1991.
Markus R.A., The Latin Fathers. W: The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c. 350-c. 1450, red. J.H. Burns, Cambridge 2010.
Mason R.A., George Buchanan, James VI and the Presbyterians. W: Scots and Britons – Scottish political thought and the union of 1603, red. R.A. Mason, Cambridge 1994.
Mason R.A., Imagining Scotland: Scottish political thought and the problem of Britain 1560-1650. W: Scots and Britons – Scottish political thought and the union of 1603, red. R.A. Mason, Cambridge 1994.
Mason R.A., Introduction. W: A dialogue on the Law of Kingship among the Scots – A critical Edition and Translation of George Buchanan’s De Iure Regni apud Scotos Dialogus, red. R.A. Mason, M.S. Smith, Aldershot 2004.
Nederman C.J., A Duty to Kill: John of Salisbury’s Theory of Tyrannicide, „The Review of Politics” 50, nr 3 (1988).
Nederman C.J., Nature, Sin and the Origins of Society: The Ciceronian Tradition in Medieval Political Thought, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 49, nr (1988).
Oakley F., Almain and Major: Conciliar Theory on the Eve of the Reformation, „The American Historical Review” 70, nr 3 (1965).
Oakley F., On the Road from Constance to 1688: The Political Thought of John Major and George Buchanan, „Journal of British Studies” 1, nr 2 (1962).
Pennington K., Law, legislative authority, and theories of government, 1150-1300. W: The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350-c.1450, red. J.H. Burns, Cambridge 2010.
Pennington K., Władca i prawo (1200-1600): Suwerenność monarchy a prawa poddanych w zachodnioeuropejskiej tradycji prawnej, przeł. A. Pysiak, Warszawa 2012.
Pettit P., Republicanism: A Theory of of Freedom and Government, Oxford 1997.
Philips J.E., George Buchanan and the Sidney Circle, „Huntington Library Quarterly” 12, nr 1 (1948).
Procopé J., Greek and Roman political theory. W: The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350-c.1450, red. J.H. Burns, Cambridge 2010.
Quillet J., Community, counsel and representation. W: The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350-c.1450, red. J.H. Burns, Cambridge 2010.
Rau Z., Wstęp, [w:] Locke, J., Dwa traktaty o rządzie, przeł. Z. Rau, Warszawa 2015.
Reale G., Historia filozofii starożytnej. T. III. System epoki hellenistycznej, przeł. E.I. Zieliński, Lublin 1999.
Salmon J.H.M., An alternative theory of popular resistance: Buchanan, Rossaeus, and Locke. W: Tenże, Renaissance and Revolt: Essays in the intellectual and social history of early modern France, Cambridge 2002.
Seagrave S.A., Cicero, Aquinas, and contemporary issues in natural law theory, „The Review of Metaphysics” 62, nr 3 (2009).
Skinner Q., Liberty before Liberalism, Cambridge 1997.
Skinner Q., The foundations of modern political thought v. II The age of reformation, Cambridge 1978.
Strauss G., Law, Resistance, and the State: The Opposition to Roman Law in Reformation Germany, Princeton 2014.
Szlachta B., Konstytucjonalizm czy absolutyzm? Szkice z francuskiej myśli politycznej XVI wieku, Kraków 2005.
Szlachta B., Monarchia prawa? Angielska myśl polityczna doby Tudorów, Kraków 2008.
Tierney B., Natura Id Est Deus: A Case for Juristic Pantheism?, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 24, nr 3 (1963).
Tierney B., The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law, and Church Law 1150-1625, Cambridge 2001.
Tuck R., The Sleeping Sovereign – The Invention of Modern Democracy, Cambridge 2016.
Tulejski T., Doktryna władzy monarszej Jakuba VI/I, https://konserwatyzm.pl/tulejski-doktryna-wladzy-monarszej-jakuba-vi-i-stuarta/ [dostęp: 17.01.2018].
Ullmann W., Średniowieczne korzenie renesansowego humanizmu, przeł. J. Mach, Łódź 1985.
Vinx L., Constitutional Indifferentism and Republican Freedom, „Political Theory” 38, nr 6 (2010).
Wollman D.H., The Biblical Justification for Resistance to Authority in Ponet’s and Goodman’s Polemics, „The sixteenth century journal” 13, nr 4 (1982).
Ziółkowski A., Historia powszechna: Starożytność, Warszawa 2009.
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.